<h2>Given below is a short elaboration of concurrent powers, its functioning, and its distribution:
</h2>
- Conducting and regulating elections and allied activities, the imposition of taxes, and borrowing money can be identified as three concurrent powers of government.
- These powers have been set up in the given manner in order to avoid traits like imbalance of power, partial distribution of resources, excessive dominance of the central government on the state governments, etc.
- The federal government should not be in full control of concurrent powers as it would result in emergence of conflicts between the states and the federal government.
It was a way for them to get jobs. If a former slave was educated, it could mean a new beginning for them. On the other hand if a slave was uneducated, they would not have enough money for stable living requierments. So it was very important to be educated because you could start a new life.
Answer: cross-functional team
Explanation: A cross-functional team are a team of people from different level of organization having their own separate expertise but working hand in hand to achieve a common goal.
A typical example is when people from different functional area of a company come together to work to achieve the common goal of the company, this is called cross-functional team.
Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that necessitates courts to follow historical cases when creating a ruling on a similar current or future case. Stare decisis safeguards that cases with identical facts be approached in the same way, except overruled by the same court or a higher court such as the US Supreme Court. Simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions. Stare decisis is a Latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided". The US common law system has a integrated system of determining legal matters from the principle of stare decisis and precedent. A past ruling or judgment on any circumstance is known as a precedent. Stare decisis commands that courts look to precedent when overseeing an on-going case with similar circumstances.
