The drug prevention has it major limitation and that is: the drug prevention does not clearly states the goal that the drug is trying to achieve. It is the major limitation for this is the question that has always be unclear and unexplained as to how and why should this act be proceeded.
The second question is false, because we have federal, state, and local law.
Answer:
1. Patricians
2. Plebeians
3. It was the first Roman law
4. Consuls
Explanation:
1. Patricians were known to be the wealthiest and most of them were aristocrats. They were allowed to be a part of the government. Also, their women also enjoyed some degree of freedom.
2. All other citizens in Rome were referred to as Plebeians. They were common people who were mainly landowners, shop keepers, and merchants. They couldn't hold the public office but they were allowed to vote.
3. The law of 12 tables was important because it was the first Roman law to help people identify legal and illegal activities.
4. Consuls had the highest level. Each year the citizens of Rome elected two consuls whose power was equally divided and served for one year.
The last answer would be the answer that I would think of because then it would get to complicated
The options are not included with this question. However, we can still try to understand which factors were considered when writing this sample response. In this response, the author takes into accout the type of rhetorical appeal that John Muir employed. He tells us that Muir used an appeal to logic (<em>logos</em>) when providing evidence about the destruction of trees. He also tells us that Muir used an appeal to credibility (<em>ethos</em>) by showing that he knows the history of individual trees. Finally, the author uses an appeal to emotion (<em>pathos</em>) by using emotional language.
