Answer:
hey
Step-by-step explanation:
I don’t understand why people are sending files as answer
<span>So rather than think about how to find the whole numbers, let's try to find the two perfect squares nearest to 38. There is one greater than it and one smaller than it. The square root will lie between the squared value of each. (e.g. 64 is the perfect square, 8 is the squared value i refer to)
</span><span>
6 ,7. 6squared is 36 and 7 squared is 42
therefore 38 lies between these two numbers</span>
We have been given that in 1983, the per capita consumption was 39.7 pounds, and in 1989 it was 47 pounds.
Let us assume t=0 corresponds to year 1980.
Hence, we can express the given information as ordered pairs as (3,39.7) and (9,47).
We can to find a linear function passing through these points. Let us first find slope of the linear function:
We can write the required linear function as:
Upon simplifying this, we get:
In order to find per capita consumption in 1995, we need to substitute t=15 in this function.
Therefore, we would expect the per capita consumption of chicken in 1995 to be 54.3.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Table:
it says that x is the amount of tickets, so that would be 1, 2, 3, etc.
It says that y is the money spent and also tells us that one ticket is $3, so obviously the money would be increasing by thirds: 3, 6, 9
This all goes with the first table (table A)
Graph:
As for the graph-
X = # of tickets (1, 2, 3)
Y = $ spent (3. 6, 9)
The answer would be graph A, because when looking at it you can tell that the starting point is at $0 for 0 tickets, unlike for graph b, which shows $3 for 0 tickets, which does not make any sense. But when you continue on when graph A, you can tell that this answer choice is correct, because every time, the y value is 3 times the x value which means: y=3x
