Answer:
In every form of analysis, it is always safer to take a macro or holistic view of the situation. This is true for the investment performance of a manager. One investment decision that went right does not suffice to classify an investment portfolio manager as proficient, neither is one that went south enough to tag him deficient.
The forecasting ability of managers, on the balance of probability, will vary for different cases, with a helicopter view of providing a more accurate measure of their performance.
However, if it was possible to analyse the market for volatility and adjust our forecasts it becomes unnecessary to look at and analyse all the information from a 12-month cycle before coming to terms about the performance of the manager.
Cheers!
Answer:
a) see attached graph. There is nothing unusual with the supply curve, it is simply fixed. This happens to most services, e.g. there is a fixed number of hotel rooms available for rent, in the short run you cannot add more rooms per night if the demand increases. In order to increase the quantity supplied, you would need to build a larger hotel, or in this case, a larger stadium.
b) the equilibrium price is $8 and the equilibrium quantity is 8,000 tickets
c) if the college plans to increase enrollment, the demand might increase, leading to a higher equilibrium price, but the supply will remain the same until the stadium is expanded.
Explanation:
Price Quantity Demanded (Qd) Quantity Supplied (Qs)
$4 10,000 8,000
$8 8,000 8,000
$12 6,000 8,000
$16 4,000 8,000
$20 2,000 8,000
Answer:
MASTER
Explanation:
Apparently it says to write it so that's is what I did is there anything wrong about that bye
Career Resilience: Major Trends<span> That Will </span><span>Impact Your Future !</span>
Answer:
The dimension that minimizes the container is width = 1; base = 2 and height = 5
The minimum cost is $36
Explanation:
Let the width be x
So:





Volume of the box is:
---- Given
Volume is calculated as:



Substitute 10 for Volume

Make h the subject


Next, we calculate area of the sides.

Because it has an open top, the area is:

![Sides\ Area = 2[(Width * Height) + (Base * Height)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Sides%5C%20Area%20%3D%202%5B%28Width%20%2A%20Height%29%20%2B%20%28Base%20%2A%20Height%29%5D)


![Sides\ Area = 2[(Width * Height) + (Base * Height)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Sides%5C%20Area%20%3D%202%5B%28Width%20%2A%20Height%29%20%2B%20%28Base%20%2A%20Height%29%5D)
![Side\ Area = 2[(x * h) + (2x * h)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Side%5C%20Area%20%3D%202%5B%28x%20%2A%20h%29%20%2B%20%282x%20%2A%20h%29%5D)
![Side\ Area = 2[(xh) + (2xh)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Side%5C%20Area%20%3D%202%5B%28xh%29%20%2B%20%282xh%29%5D)
![Side\ Area = 2[3xh]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Side%5C%20Area%20%3D%202%5B3xh%5D)

The base area costs $6 per m²
So, the cost of 2x² would be:


The side cost area costs $0.8 per m²
So, 6xh would cost


Total Cost (C) is:

Recall that 
So:




Take derivative of C

Take LCM

Equate
to 0

Cross multiply


Add 24 to both sides

Divide through by 24

Take cube roots of both sides

Recall that


and 
Solve for these dimensions:






i.e.

<em>Hence, the dimension that minimizes the container is width = 1; base = 2 and height = 5</em>
<em></em>
Recall that

Substitute 1 for x



<em>The minimum cost is $36</em>