1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lara31 [8.8K]
3 years ago
7

How far from a -7.80 μC point charge must a 2.40 μC point charge be placed in order for the electric potential energy of the pai

r of charges to be -0.500 J ? (Take the energy to be zero when the charges are infinitely far apart.)
Physics
1 answer:
Naddik [55]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Distance between two point charges, r = 0.336 meters

Explanation:

Given that,

Charge 1, q_1=-7.8\ \mu C=-7.8\times 10^{-6}\ C

Charge 2, q_2=2.4\ \mu C=2.4\times 10^{-6}\ C

Electric potential energy, U = -0.5 J

The electric potential energy at a point r is given by :

U=k\dfrac{q_1q_2}{r}

r=k\dfrac{q_1q_2}{U}

r=9\times 10^9\times \dfrac{-7.8\times 10^{-6}\times 2.4\times 10^{-6}}{-0.5}

r = 0.336 meters

So, the distance between two point charges is 0.336 meters. Hence, this is the required solution.

You might be interested in
What’s the origin of a meteor shower?
Bogdan [553]

Answer: I hope this helps I read this in a book once

Explanation:

Shower meteors come from the dust released by comets as they travel through our solar system. The dust spreads out along the comet's orbit and forms an elliptical trail of debris that passes around the sun and crosses the orbits of the planets.

6 0
3 years ago
Which statement is true about the thermal energy of an object? Choose the correct answer. 1). Thermal energy is the internal pot
Brums [2.3K]
This thermal energy flows as heat within the box and floor, ultimately raising the temperature of both of these objects.
5 0
2 years ago
Familiarize yourself with the map showing the DSDP Leg 3 drilling locations and the position of the mid-ocean ridge (Figure 1 to
Inga [223]

Answer:

For more than 40 years, results from scientific ocean drilling have contributed to global understanding of Earth’s biological, chemical, geological, and physical processes and feedback mechanisms. The majority of these internationally recognized results have been derived from scientific ocean drilling conducted through three programs—the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP; 1968-1983), the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP; 1984-2003), and the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP; 2003-2013)—that can be traced back to the first scientific ocean drilling venture, Project Mohole, in 1961. Figure 1.1 illustrates the distribution of drilling and sampling sites for each of the programs, and Appendix A presents tables of DSDP, ODP, and IODP legs and expeditions. Although each program has benefited from broad, international partnerships and research support, the United States has taken a leading role in providing financial continuity and administrative coordination over the decades that these programs have existed. Currently, the United States and Japan are the lead international partners of IODP, while a consortium of 16 European countries and Canada participates in IODP under the auspices of the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD). Other countries (including China, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, and India) are also involved.

As IODP draws to a close in 2013, a new process for defining the scope of the next phase of scientific ocean drilling has begun. Illuminating Earth’s Past, Present, and Future: The International Ocean Discovery Program Science Plan for 2013-20231 (hereafter referred to as “the science plan”), which is focused on defining the scientific research goals of the next 10-year phase of scientific ocean drilling, was completed in June 2011 (IODP-MI, 2011). The science plan was based on a large, multidisciplinary international drilling community meeting held in September 2009.2 A draft of the plan was released in June 2010 to allow for additional comments from the broader geoscience community prior to its finalization. As part of the planning process for future scientific ocean drilling, the National Science Foundation (NSF) requested that the National Research Council (NRC) appoint an ad hoc committee (Appendix B) to review the scientific accomplishments of U.S.-supported scientific ocean drilling (DSDP, ODP, and IODP) and assess the science plan’s potential for stimulating future transformative scientific discoveries (see Box 1.1 for Statement of Task). According to NSF, “Transformative research involves ideas, discoveries, or tools that radically change our understanding of an important existing scientific or engineering concept or educational practice or leads to the creation of a new paradigm or field of science, engineering, or education. Such research challenges current understanding or provides pathways to new frontiers.”3 This report is the product of the committee deliberations on that review and assessment.

HISTORY OF U.S.-SUPPORTED SCIENTIFIC OCEAN DRILLING, 1968-2011

The first scientific ocean drilling, Project Mohole, was conceived by U.S. scientists in 1957. It culminated in drilling 183 m beneath the seafloor using the CUSS 1 drillship in 1961. During DSDP, Scripps Institution of Oceanography was responsible for drilling operations with the drillship Glomar Challenger. The Joint Oceanographic Institutions for Deep Earth Sampling (JOIDES), which initially consisted of four U.S. universities and research institutions, provided scientific advice. Among its numerous achievements, DSDP

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
if a negatively charged rod is held near a neutral metal ball, the ball is attracted to the rod. this happens because
svet-max [94.6K]
This is because opposite charges attract
3 0
2 years ago
Explain the difference between the 7 parts of the electromagnetic spectrum.
inn [45]

Answer:

The difference between the two is, well for one

Spectrum: The entire range that the "waves" could be such, as visible light, x-ray's and so on.

Waves: These are different because they aren't telling you or showing the entire spectrum just which they length that they are.

It may confuse you but it makes sense to me (Sorry)

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the best example of physical contamination?
    6·1 answer
  • A merchant in Katmandu sells you a solid gold 6 kg statue for a very reasonable price. When you get home, you wonder whether or
    11·1 answer
  • Can anyone tell me how to read a micrometer screw gauge I want very clear instructions.
    8·1 answer
  • An object of mass 80 kg is released from rest from a boat into the water and allowed to sink. While gravity is pulling the objec
    13·1 answer
  • True or false <br> A ball thrown horizontally.Gravity causes the ball to continue horizontally.
    14·2 answers
  • An airplane starts at rest and accelerates down the runway for 25 s. At the end of the runway, its final velocity is 75 m/s east
    7·1 answer
  • Give one example of a scientific discovery that has both advantages and disadvantages and discuss the tradeoffs involved in use
    11·1 answer
  • Choose the +x-direction to point to the right. • Object 1 has a mass 1.66 kg and is moving to the right at 11.2 m/s. • Object 2
    7·1 answer
  • In the diagram, q1= -2.60*10^-9 C and
    10·1 answer
  • Man is walking due east at the rate of of 4kmph and the rain is falling 30° east of vertical with a velocity of 6kmph the veloci
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!