1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivahew [28]
3 years ago
15

Henry has a $10,000 car insurance policy with a $400 per claim deductible. Henry is involved in an accident, and his car sustain

s $7,000 worth of damage. How much will Henry pay? $400 $600 $3,000 $6,600
Business
1 answer:
Sidana [21]3 years ago
5 0
$400. He is only responsible for the deductible. His insurance covers up to $10000 in damage
You might be interested in
Which of the following is true about a business plan?
dusya [7]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

the plan can change from buget sponsors and othere factors

3 0
3 years ago
Each month a company can rent capital for $7.500 per unit and can hire workers for $2.500 each Currently me company is using 4 u
Sophie [7]

Answer:

Please see attachment

Explanation:

Please see attachment

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
3 years ago
8. In a car insurance policy, collision insurance covers
prisoha [69]
I am pretty sure that it's d, the cost of your car if it's stolen because its a car insurance

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In December, Davis Company had the following cost flows: Molding Department Grinding Department Finishing Department Direct mate
slava [35]

Answer:

Required 1 ; Journals

Work In Process : Grinding Department $ 128,000 (debit)

Work In Process : Molding Department $ 128,000  (credit)

<em>Being transfer of costs from Molding to Grinding Department</em>

<em />

Work In Process : Molding Department $ 128,000  (debit)

Work In Process : Grinding Department $ 128,000 (credit)

<em>Being transfer of costs from Grinding to Molding Department</em>

<em />

Finished Goods Account $40,000 (debit)

Work In Process : Finishing Department $40,000 (credit)

<em>Being transfer of costs from Finishing department to finished goods account</em>

Required 2 : Difference

<u>Job Order Costing </u>

Each production is unique and there may be no transfers to and from other departments. The is no inventory from previous processes as this is unique to the job order.

<u>Process Costing (Currently in use)</u>

There are transfers from and to other departments. Production is in sequence. For each departments we may also have inventories

Explanation:

<u>Finishing Department Costs Calculation</u>

Direct materials           $17,200

Direct labor                  $11,600

Applied overhead        $11,200

Total                            $40,000

Difference :

You should be able to see that the Journal entries above depicts a process costing system. Now provide reasons why this system differs from the job-order cost system. See the reasons above.

<em />

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Presented below is information related to equipment owned by Bramble Company at December 31, 2020. Cost $10,260,000 Accumulated
    8·1 answer
  • What is gdp expressed in constant, or unchanging, prices called?
    10·2 answers
  • Quick Clean Chemicals outsources its production to contract manufacturers located in underdeveloped nations where unskilled labo
    13·1 answer
  • Anderson Corp. began the period with $200 of supplies. During the period, $500 of supplies were purchased. At the end of the per
    8·1 answer
  • A quantitative job evaluation procedure that determines a job's relative value on the basis of quantitative assessments of speci
    10·1 answer
  • Assume that a $1,000,000 par value, semiannual coupon US Treasury note with four years to maturity has a coupon rate of 3%. The
    8·1 answer
  • Oil Dawg, an oil tanker company, shipped oil to coasts all over the US. During many deliveries, the crew was dumping waste into
    15·1 answer
  • The following information pertains to Crane Video Company.
    7·1 answer
  • Jarrod's Meat Shop doubles as a butcher shop and a sandwich shop that sells to both individuals and a nearby hospital system. On
    14·1 answer
  • Six acres of prime undeveloped property are sold for $2.25 per square foot. how much did the buyer pay?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!