D = 171 - (61+53) = 171 -124 = 47
E = 171 - 90 = 81
A = 81 - (34+24) = 81 - 58 = 23
B = 61 - 23 = 38
C = 90 - (33+ 38) = 90 - 71 = 19
answer is B.
Of means multiplication. So the question is 1/3 X 1 1/2. First make 1 1/2 improper: 3/2. Then multiply the numerators (top numbers) and denominaters (bottom numbers): 1x3=3, 3x2=6, =3/6. Now simplify 3/6=1/2. Then multiply that by 2, since he used 2 pieces: 1/2x2=1. John used 1 meter :)
Answer:
The correct option is c which is if this test was one-tailed instead of two-tailed, you would reject the null.
Step-by-step explanation:
a: This statement cannot be true as the p-value for a 1 tailed test is dependent on the level of significance and other features.
b: This statement cannot be true as there is no valid mathematical correlation between the p-value of the one-tailed test and the current p-value.
c: This statement is true because due to the enhanced level of significance, the null hypothesis will not be rejected.
d: This statement is inverse of statement c which cannot be true.
e: The statement cannot be true as there is no correlation between the current p-value and the p-value of 1 tailed test. The correlation exists between the values of one-tailed and two-tailed p-values.
They are up and down and left and right
Answer:
$148.50
Step-by-step explanation
I solved this by using fractions.
x/450=33/100 is how I set up the problem. 33/100 represents 33%, while x/450 represents how much the jacket costs now.
I then went across and multiplied x by 100, and 450 by 33, which gave me 100x=14850. After this I divided each side by 100 to get 148.5, being the cost of the jacket.
