Answer:
1. ![K_eq = [Ca^{2+][OH^-]^2 = K_{sp}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_eq%20%3D%20%5BCa%5E%7B2%2B%5D%5BOH%5E-%5D%5E2%20%3D%20K_%7Bsp%7D)
2. a. No effect;
b. Products;
c. Products;
d. Reactants
Explanation:
1. Equilibrium constant might be written using standard guidelines:
- only aqueous species and gases are included in the equilibrium constant excluding solids and liquids;
- the constant involves two parts: in the numerator of a fraction we include the product of the concentrations of products;
- the denominator includes the product of the concentrations of reactants;
- the concentrations are raised to the power of the coefficients in the balanced chemical equation.
Based on the guidelines, we have two ions on the product side, a solid on the left side. Thus, the equilibrium constant has the following expression:
![K_eq = [Ca^{2+][OH^-]^2 = K_{sp}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_eq%20%3D%20%5BCa%5E%7B2%2B%5D%5BOH%5E-%5D%5E2%20%3D%20K_%7Bsp%7D)
2. a. In the following problems, we'll be considering the common ion effect. According to the principle of Le Chatelier, an increase in concentration of any of the ions would shift the equilibrium towards the formation of our precipitate.
In this problem, we're adding calcium carbonate. It is insoluble, so it wouldn't have any effect on the equilibrium.
b. Sodium carbonate is completely soluble, it would release carbonate ions. The carbonate ions would combine with calcium cations and more precipitate would dissolve. This would shift the equilibrium towards formation of the products to reproduce the amount of calcium cations.
c. HCl would neutralize calcium hydroxide to produce calcium chloride and water, so the amount of calcium ions would increase, therefore, the products are favored.
d. NaOH contains hydroxide anions, so we'd have a common ion. An increase in hydroxide would produce more precipitate, so our reactants are favored.
I am currently learning this and I would say Suspensions!
Hope this helps :)
I believe Cl (chlorine) would have a -1 charge since H tends to have a +1 charge.
Hope this helps!!! :)
The data provided is of specific heat
The relation between specific heat, heat absrobed and temperature change is
Q = mass of substance X change in temperature X specific heat
Now if we have provided same amount of heat to two substances of different specific heat, the substance with lower specific heat will heat up more as compared to the substance with higher specific heat.
[Specific heat is the amount of heat absorbed by a substance (say nickel) to raise it temperature by one degree if we have taken one gram of substance]
Higher the specific heat higher the heat required to raise the temperature upto same extent.
Thus as the specific heat of Nickel is less, it will heat up easily
Answer: Granite, because it needs to absorb more energy to increase its temperature