Answer:
There is enough evidence to support the claim
Step-by-step explanation:
We are conduction a hypothesis test for dependent samples. We want to see if there was a change in the test subjects cholesterol levels.
For our situation:
n = 64
d = 0.7
s = 1.72
µ(d) = 0
The hypothesis are:
H0: µ(d) = 0
Ha: µ(d) > 0
This is a right tailed test.
We are testing at the 1% level of significance. Our critical region is z > 2.325
If our test statistic is in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis
See attached photo for the calculation of the test statistic and conclusion of the test
I gotchu
The perimeter is 35. If we were to change the width, which is one of the dimensions of the flower bed, The perimeter will change. This means that perimeter will no longer be 35. So in order to keep the perimeter as it is, if we change one dimension, we must also change the other.
Let's solve for the length, using the formula to see how much the length changes from.
p = 2l + 2w
35 = 2l + 2(15)
35 = 2l + 30
5 = 2l
2.5 = l
We must increase the length from 2.5 feet. This is because decreasing one dimension will decrease the perimeter. But if we increase the other dimension as well, it will restore the perimeter to where is was initially.