A theorem can be proven (from axioms or prior theorems), using logic.
A hypothesis can be supported by evidence. The more evidence in support of the hypothesis, the more likely the hypothesis is to be correct. However, you’re always at the mercy of contrary evidence appearing in the future, to reduce the likelihood or even invalidate a hypothesis.
A (mathematical) proof suffers no such vulnerability to future evidence, as long as you hold the axioms of the theory to be true, and as long as there was no flaw in the construction of the proof.
Question:
1) The universe is cooling which, according to the Big Bang Theory, is expected to happen as the cosmos accumulates.
2) The universe is warming which, according to the Big Bang Theory, is expected to happen as the cosmos disperses.
3) The universe is cooling which, according to the Big Bang Theory, is expected to happen as the cosmos disperses.
4) The universe is warming which, according to the Big Bang Theory, is expected to happen as the cosmos accumulates.
Answer:
The correct option is;
3) The Universe is cooling which, according to the Big Bang Theory, is expected to happen as the cosmos disperses
Explanation:
With the temperature measurement carried out using the CSIRO radio telescope, Astronomers have been able to determine a temperature difference in the universe from 5.08 Kelvin 7.2 billion light years away to 2.73 Kelvin in the Universe today, which is in support of the Big Bang theory that as the Universe expanded from a state of extreme temperature that cools down as the Universe expands or the cosmos disperses.
There is no sound in space because there is no medium to move it. However i think the big bang can still been seen in the form of background radiation but i am unsure.
Here,
Load distance (Ld) = 30 cm
Effort distance (Ed) = 60 cm
Load (L) = 200N
Effort (E) = ?
Now, By using formula,
or, E * Ed = L * Ld
or, E * 60 = 200 * 30
or, E = 6000/60
◆ E = 100N
This is a Right answer...
I hope you understand...
