Excercise 1:
No, this is not simplified fully. The full answer would be <span>−7dk+14d−21k</span>−7, not <span>14d - 9 - 21k - 7dk + 2. So, it is not equivalent.
</span><span>
Excercise 4:
</span><span>7dk (2 - 3 - 1) - 7
</span>
Just multiply 7dk into (2) (-3) and (-1)
you'd get:
<span><span>−<span>14dk</span></span>+</span>−<span>7 after simplifying it fully.
</span>
p = parameter
w = width
w+2.75
p = 2w+2(w+2.75) = <span>4w</span>+<span>5.5 = 30
Answer to the last one:
w = 6.125</span>
Answer:
i dlnt know 15 I think not sure
The income that you can save from each biweekly paycheck is
.. $1626 -6.2%*1626 -1.45%*1626 -85 -225 -775 = $416.61
After 14 pay periods, you will have saved
.. 14*$416.61 = $5832.54
This is more than your estimated trip requirement.
c. $5833; yes
Answer:
discriminant is zero (0)
Step-by-step explanation:
Actually, you have a double root here: {6, 6}: "two real, equal roots." That tells us immediately that the value of the discriminant was zero (0).
Lol I actually laughed at this silly much ?