Answer:
Part A.
$16.75
Part B.
Variable costing income statement for 2017
Fi
Part C.
Part D.
Absorption costing income statement for 2017
Explanation:
<em>The question is incomplete, however see explanations below</em>
Cost per unit - Variable Costing
<em>Only consider the Variable Manufacturing Costs</em>
Cost per unit - Variable Costing = $16.75
Cost per unit - Absorption Costing
<em>Consider Both Variable and Fixed Manufacturing Costs</em>
Answer:
If Morocco produces 120 belts and exports 70 belts:
- it will receive 105 swords (= 70 x 1.5)
- it will consume 50 belts (its domestic consumption of belts will decrease by 10)
Explanation:
Without trade, Morocco will produce 60 swords and 60 belts and consume them all, but if it engages in trade, it will produce 120 belts.
- Morocco's opportunity cost of producing one belt = 60 / 60 = <u>1</u>
- Morocco's opportunity cost of producing one sword = 60 / 60 = 1
- Estonia's opportunity cost of producing one belt = 100 / 40 = 2.5
- Estonia's opportunity cost of producing one sword = 40 / 100 = <u>0.25</u>
If Morocco produces 120 belts and keeps current consumption level:
- it consumes 60 belts
- it can trade 40 belts for 60 swords
- it will have a 20 belt surplus production
If Morocco produces 120 belts and exports 70 belts:
- it will receive 105 swords (= 70 x 1.5)
- it will consume 50 belts
Answer:
you can see it on your own food and drink and eat a few of these videos for your finger and your answer for this recipe for the sine effect on the app
Answer: c). Ron should send a prospecting letter to see if there are any unadvertised openings
Explanation: Since Ron is interested at working at Gas’N’Go, but is unable to find an opening on the company Web site he should try and send a prospecting letter to see if there are any unadvertised openings. It might happen at times that companies do not post online for certain positions. but when Ron send a letter he might have a chance to get a call from them.
Answer:
<u>Organic.</u>
Explanation:
An organic organizational structure has emerged from a current need for companies to quickly adapt to market changes and optimize processes. Which is justified by the great competition of the market and its instability.
This structural model is characterized by greater flexibility rather than rigidity, as decisions are decentralized and there is greater interaction between the functional areas of the organization. The benefits of this organic structural model are mainly the possibility of innovation and adaptation to changes, the hierarchical flexibility that generates greater interaction between employees and motivation to contribute with solutions to possible problems.
But like every structural model, there are also the negatives, which can be justified by the emphasis on relationships, which can cause inefficiency at some point, as concern for human needs can be taken into account more than concern for technical efficiency, which is a relevant challenge for companies with an organic structure.
