Answer:
In Canada, the amount of vacation pay is equal to <u>2%</u> of the employee's pay for the preceding year per week of vacation.
Explanation:
In addition to that, within a company we can divide employees into two groups:
- Those who worked for the company for less than five consecutive years: these employees get 4% of their payment of the year of employment towards vacation pay. Also, they are entitled to two weeks of vacation per year.
- Those who worked for more than five consecutive years in the company: these employees get 6% of their payment of the year of employment towards vacation pay. Also, they are entitled to three weeks of vacation per year.
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
From the classification of data, primary data is also known as the root of information, they are data's gotten from the horses mouth, if we are to classify how authentic they are. They are data's that explains true explanation that can't be neglected. It is from primary data that other information's and added on are gotten to become secondary data.
From the option above, option A is what explains what primary data is which is the right and best choice to the question.
Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
Answer:
The United States believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which posed a great threat at the hands of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein. It also believed that terrorists were supported and even harbored by the country. So, to remove the dictator from power and to get rid of any weapons and eliminate or drive out terrorists were the main objectives behind the attack on Iraq.
Explanation:
The rationale behind the motive to invade and attack Iraq was to primarily <u>end the regime of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein</u>. Other purposes were to <u>end the harboring of terrorists in the land</u> and <u>eliminate any weapons of mass destruction that Iraq was believed to be in possession of</u>.
The attack on Iraq by the United States in 2003 was based on US's beliefs that the Arab nation has disobeyed the demands of the United Nations and had harbored and supported terrorists. Moreover, the need to eliminate the dictator Saddam Hussein and establish a democratic government and provide peace to the Iraq people also became the main objective behind the invasion. The US also believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which can act as a huge threat to the overall safety of everyone around the world. So, the need to identify, isolate and destroy such weapons before they are actually put into use also led to the attack. US military continued to stay in Iraq till 2011 after which all troops were withdrawn.
