Answer:
The molarity of urea in this solution is 6.39 M.
Explanation:
Molarity (M) is <em>the number of moles of solute in 1 L of solution</em>; that is
To calculate the molality, we need to know the number of moles of urea and the volume of solution in liters. We assume 100 grams of solution.
Our first step is to calculate the moles of urea in 100 grams of the solution,
using the molar mass a conversion factor. The total moles of 100g of a 37.2 percent by mass solution is
60.06 g/mol ÷ 37.2 g = 0.619 mol
Now we need to calculate the volume of 100 grams of solution, and we use density as a conversion factor.
1.032 g/mL ÷ 100 g = 96.9 mL
This solution contains 0.619 moles of urea in 96.9 mL of solution. To express it in molarity, we need to calculate the moles present in 1000 mL (1 L) of the solution.
0.619 mol/96.9 mL × 1000 mL= 6.39 M
Therefore, the molarity of the solution is 6.39 M.
Answer:The process of science is iterative.
Science circles back on itself so that useful ideas are built upon and used to learn even more about the natural world. This often means that successive investigations of a topic lead back to the same question, but at deeper and deeper levels. Let's begin with the basic question of how biological inheritance works. In the mid-1800s, Gregor Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate — that information is passed along in discrete packets that cannot be diluted. In the early 1900s, Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri (among others) helped show that those particles of inheritance, today known as genes, were located on chromosomes. Experiments by Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, and many others soon elaborated on this understanding by showing that it was the DNA in chromosomes which carries genetic information. And then in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, again aided by the work of many others, provided an even more detailed understanding of inheritance by outlining the molecular structure of DNA. Still later in the 1960s, Marshall Nirenberg, Heinrich Matthaei, and others built upon this work to unravel the molecular code that allows DNA to encode proteins. And it doesn't stop there. Biologists have continued to deepen and extend our understanding of genes, how they are controlled, how patterns of control themselves are inherited, and how they produce the physical traits that pass from generation to generation. The process of science is not predetermined.
Any point in the process leads to many possible next steps, and where that next step leads could be a surprise. For example, instead of leading to a conclusion about tectonic movement, testing an idea about plate tectonics could lead to an observation of an unexpected rock layer. And that rock layer could trigger an interest in marine extinctions, which could spark a question about the dinosaur extinction — which might take the investigator off in an entirely new direction. At first this process might seem overwhelming. Even within the scope of a single investigation, science may involve many different people engaged in all sorts of different activities in different orders and at different points in time — it is simply much more dynamic, flexible, unpredictable, and rich than many textbooks represent it as. But don't panic! The scientific process may be complex, but the details are less important than the big picture …
An ionic compound consists of a metal AND a non-metal.
<em>Option A:</em>
Oxygen and fluorine are non-metals.
<em>Option B:</em>
Sodium and aluminium are non-metals.
<em>Option C:</em>
Calcium is a metal and chlorine is a non-metal.
<em>Option D:</em>
Nitrogen and sulfur are non-metals.
Thus, the answer is C.
Yes the dióxido de carbono is very important
Answer is: 3. Water and carbon dioxide should both be moved to the products side, and glucose and oxygen should be moved to the reactants side.
Balanced chemical reaction for cellular respiration (convert biochemical energy):
C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6O₂ → 6CO₂ + 6H₂O + energy, or:
glucose + oxygen → carbon dioxide + water + energy.
This reaction is exothermic (energy is released).
