Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Evidence are simply facts to support a claim, while counterexamples are instances to show the contradictions in a claim
<em>The question is incomplete, as the required drop-down menus are missing. So, I will give a general explanation</em>
<em />
To show that a statement is true, you need evidence.
Take for instance:

The evidence that the above proof is true is by taking the <em>squares of both sides of </em>


However, a counterexample does not need a proof per se.
What a counterexample needs is just an instance or example, to show that:

An instance to prove that:
is false is:

Hence, the complete statement could be:
<em>In a direct proof, evidence is used to support a proof
. On the other hand, a counterexample is a single example that shows that a proof is false.</em>
<em />
Read more about evidence and counterexample at:
brainly.com/question/88496
Point F is on line a, so it does represent Josiah's distance at a certain time. Also, point F is below line b, so it represents a distance that is less than Chana's distance. This is a distance-time graph problem.
<h3>
What is the proof for the above?</h3>
Recall that Josiah had a head start of 10 meters and he skates at 2 meters per second.
Since Y is the function that represents the distance in meters from the finished line, by observation, it is clear to see that all the factors that are related to his race are adequately represented in:
y = 10 + 2x
Where 10 is the head start in meters
2 is the rate at which he skates per second; and
x is the unknown amount of time in seconds.
Given that the point F sits over 25 seconds,
that is F(y) = 10 + 2 * 25
= 60 meters.
Hence, Point F is on line a, so it does represent Josiah's distance at exactly 25 seconds.
Learn more about distance-time graphs at:
brainly.com/question/4931057
#SPJ1