<h2>The ice melted is nearly 2.8 kg </h2>
Explanation:
The quantity of heat required to melt the ice can be found by the relation .
ΔQ = m x L
here L is used for the latent heat of fusion .
Its value is 334 J per gram for ice .
Thus m =
=
= 2836 gram
or = 2.8 kg approx
(a) 6.04 rev/s
The speed of the ball is given by:

where
is the angular speed
r is the distance of the ball from the centre of the circle
In situation 1), we have

r = 0.600 m
So the speed of the ball is

In situation 2), we have

r = 0.900 m
So the speed of the ball is

So, the ball has greater speed when rotating at 6.04 rev/s.
(b) 
The centripetal acceleration of the ball is given by

where
v is the speed
r is the distance of the ball from the centre of the trajectory
For situation 1),
v = 30.6 m/s
r = 0.600 m
So the centripetal acceleration is

(c) 
For situation 2 we have
v = 34.1 m/s
r = 0.900 m
So the centripetal acceleration is

Answer:
B
Explanation:
Friction acts in a direction opposite to the motion of an object
Refer to the attached figure. Xp may not be between the particles but the reasoning is the same nonetheless.
At xp the electric field is the sum of both electric fields, remember that at a coordinate x for a particle placed at x' we have the electric field of a point charge (all of this on the x-axis of course):

Now At xp we have:


Which is a second order equation, using the quadratic formula to solve for xp would give us:

or

Plug the relevant values to get both answers.
Now, let's comment on which of those answers is the right answer. It happens that
BOTH are correct. This is simply explained by considring the following.
Let's place a possitive test charge on the system This charge feels a repulsive force due to q1 but an attractive force due to q2, if we place the charge somewhere to the left of q2 the attractive force of q2 will cancel the repulsive force of q1, this translates to a zero electric field at this x coordinate. The same could happen if we place the test charge at some point to the right of q1, hence we can have two possible locations in which the electric field is zero. The second image shows two possible locations for xp.
Spectroscopy — the use of light from a distant object to work out the object is made of — could be the single-most powerful tool astronomers use, says Professor Fred Watson from the Australian Astronomical Observatory. ... "It lets you see the chemicals being absorbed or emitted by the light source.