Just reread the text I'm sure you can find it in there. You are probably over thinking it. I know this isn't the awnsr you wanted bit you should do a bother activity to clear your mind and try again later☺
Answer:
Someone who eats at home alone instead of going to the movies with a friend
Explanation:
There is a proven link between somebody's food behavior and emotions.
Eating can be used as a form of coping with stress, giving a person rejected validation, making a person instantly happy.
In the example above, the person eating alone at home uses its food as a defense mechanism. The person has emotional issues, stemming from low self esteem and fear of rejection. Instead of dealing with these issues by addressing them directly, the person hides away and finds comfort in food. The consumed food is seen as something nice done to them, the person associate the food with the feeling of being well liked and feeling accepted.
Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
The class clown label has become a stigma. A stigma could be
described as a symbol in which it is labeled because of circumstances in which a person or thing is described such as the
class clown is labeled as a stigma because of his funny and silly character.
