ITS TOO SMALL TO SEE THAT PRINT, BUT CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME ANSWER THIS PROBLEM ON MY PROFILE I JUST POSTED IT AND NO ONE WILL HELP ME!!1
Let x represent the scores. With mean and standard deviation given,
The Empirical rule states that
1) About 68% of the x values lie between 1 standard deviation below and above the mean
2) About 95% of the x values lie between 2 standard deviation below and above the mean
3) About 99.7% of the x values lie between 3 standard deviation below and above the mean
If we consider this rule, then the percentage of scores that fall within 3 standard deviation (-3 to +3) is 99% because this is closer to 99.7%
Answer:
11.1 years
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for interest compounding continuously is:
Where A(t) is the amount after the compounding, P is the initial deposit, r is the interest rate in decimal form, and t is the time in years. Filling in what we have looks like this:
We will simplify this first a bit by dividing 2000 by 1150 to get
To get that t out the exponential position it is currently in we have to take the natural log of both sides. Since a natural log has a base of e, taking the natual log of e cancels both of them out. They "undo" each other, for lack of a better way to explain it. That leaves us with
ln(1.739130435)=.05t
Taking the natural log of that decimal on our calculator gives us
.5533852383=.05t
Now divide both sides by .05 to get t = 11.06770477 which rounds to 11.1 years.
Answer: The change is -25 dollars so she currently has 325 dollars
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
A. no, not independent
Step-by-step explanation:
Let A = "father born in Michigan" and B = "mother born in Michigan".
If A and B are independent, then ...
P(A|B) = P(A)
The table tells us ...
P(A|B) = P(A&B)/P(B) = 0.29/0.73 ≈ 0.397
and
P(A) = 0.48
Since 0.48 ≠ 0.397, we must conclude that the events are not independent.