Answer: True
=================================================
Explanation:
The first amendment prohibits congress from making any law to prohibit free speech, so that means the federal government isn't allowed to restrict speech. However, there are exceptions such as speech to cause a riot, insurrection, obscenities on public airwaves, etc. all of which are not allowed.
In contrast, a private company like Twitter has the choice whether or not to allow or ban a certain post. The first amendment of the constitution does not apply to companies such as this one. On one hand, you could argue that such restriction is a bad thing because it limits speech; but you could also argue that if the government forced companies like Twitter to do a certain action, then it restricts their freedom.
For privately owned social media companies, their platform is something they solely own 100%, meaning that the government does not own or control what goes on that platform. So this is another viewpoint as to why the first amendment doesn't apply to these companies.
In a slight bit of confusing terminology, a private company can be publicly owned. This means that the government doesn't control the company, but rather it's traded on the stock market. Those who own stock in the company are part owners of it. You would have to use the phrasing "government owned and government run" to indicate that the government has full control of such a platform.
Answer:Which Asian country controlled Britain for several hundred years? did you need to translate it in english or what?
Explanation:
Answer: When the mind is unbiased
Explanation: Making rational decisions requires one to be unbiased either as a result of religious, racial or gender influence. It also requires one to be in the right frame of mind at the time of making the decision. Emotional decisions could occur if one's judgment is influenced by religious, cultural or social inclination or sympathy towards a particular group. It could also stem from one's present state of mind at the time the judgment is passed, hence making one's judgment more of emotional than rational.
In other to make rational decisions one should be in the right frame of mind, free from external influences which could induce bias into one's decision.
If your parents ground you, it represents an example of Negative punishment because they are removing a pleasant stimulus (i.e., your freedom). Thus option C is correct.
<h3>What is the objective of punishment?</h3>
When an individual is performing repetitive mistakes again and again punishment is used to restrict this behavior and develop threats which will decrease the pattern of behaviors adopted that possess mistakes.
The negative punishment concept is introduced in Operant conditioning theory which states that any good or favorite thing should be eliminated in the routine as a course of punishment to restrict the particular action.
Therefore, option C is appropriate.
Learn more about Negative punishment, here:
brainly.com/question/13025873
#SPJ4
"Your question is incomplete, probably the complete question/missing part is:"
If your parents ground you, it represents an example of __________________ because they are removing a pleasant stimulus (i.e., your freedom).
(A) Positive punishment
(B) Positive reinforcement
(C) Negative punishment
(D) Negative reinforcement
His home state is Virginia, US (:
