Answer:
The answer is "False".
Explanation:
False, they are not following the alliance strategy because alliance strategy exhibits the process that works for mutual benefits. Alternatively, it occurs when at least two organizations join hands together for mutual benefit but in the question, a firm finds a way to increase the costs of its competitors. Therefore, this is not the case of alliance strategy.
Answer:
Europe: 50% Japan 50%
Europe: 40% Japan 60%
Europe: 60% Japan 40%
None of these values is consistent with this increase
Explanation:
Answer:
A) $24 billion
Explanation:
Here is the complete question :
Potential Real GDP $200 Billion
Natural Rate of Unemployment- 6 Percent
Actual Rate of Unemployment- 12 Percent
Refer to the accompanying data, which is for a specific year in a hypothetical economy for which Okun's law is applicable. The amount of output being forgone by the economy is
C) $15 billion. D) $18 billion. A) $12 billion. B) $24 billion.
According to Okun's law, a 1% decline in unemployment results in a 2% fall in potential GDP
Decline in unemployment = Actual Rate of Unemployment - Natural Rate of Unemployment
12 - 6 = 6%
decline in output = 6% x 2% = 12%
potential GDP lost = 12% x $200 Billion = 24 billion
Answer:
b.$57.08
Explanation:
Current price=D1/(Required return-Growth rate)
=(3.38*1.047)/(0.109-0.047)
which is equal to
=$57.08.
Answer:
Distinguish between an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage is discussed below.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage and a comparative advantage
- Absolute advantage concentrates on the marginal cost of reproduction of an asset whereas comparative advantage characteristically concentrates on the opportunity cost of production.
- Trading judgments based on comparative advantage between nations are forever respectively advantageous.
