Answer:
Italy has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese
Explanation:
Suppose that Italy and Sweden both produce rye and cheese.
Italy's opportunity cost of producing a pound of cheese is 5 bushels of rye while Sweden's opportunity cost of producing a pound of cheese is 10 bushels of rye.
<u>By comparing the opportunity cost of producing cheese in the two countries, you can tell that Italy has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese because it has a lower opportunity cost (as a matter of fact half the cost) in comparison with Sweden.</u>
<u>Comparative advantage is an economic term that refers to an economy's ability to produce goods and services at a lower opportunity cost than that of trade partners</u>
Answer:
a. $173
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of interest earned in five years is shown below;
But before that following calculations need to be done
As we know that
Simple interest = Present value × rate of interest × time period
= $2,500 × 8% × 5
= $1,000
Now the future value is
Future value = Present value × (1 + rate of interest)^number of years
= $2,500 ×(1 + 8%)^5
= $2,500 × 1.4693280768
= $3,673
Now the compound interest is
Compound interest = Future value - Present value
= $3,673 - $2,500
= $1,173
Now interest on interest is
Interest on interest = Compound interest - Simple interest
= $1,173 - $1,000
= $173
The amount of net investment income tax that the taxpayer is required to pay is $231.
<h3 />
<h3>What is
net investment income tax?</h3>
Net Investment Income Tax are generally imposed by the Internal Revenue on entities' net investment income.
Net investment income tax = ($6,150 - $75) * 3.8%
Net investment income tax = $6,050 * 3.8%
Net investment income tax = $231
In conclusion, the amount of net investment income tax that the taxpayer is required to pay is $231.
Read more about income tax
<em>brainly.com/question/25257355</em>
Answer:
retaliation.
Explanation:
Title VII of hte Civil rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination at work based on race, color, ethnic origin, gender, religion, etc. What the company was doing was wrong, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) should deal with this issue. But what they did to Hailey for complaining about the company's wrong deeds is twice as bad. The company not only keeps discriminating African American employees but also retaliates against Hailey for demanding something that is correct and legal.
