Answer:
A good design for a portable device to mix paint minimizing the shaking forces and vibrations while still effectively mixing the paint. Is:
The best design is one with centripetal movement. Instead of vertical or horizontal movement. With a container and system of holding structures made of materials that could absorb the vibration effectively.
Explanation:
First of all centripetal movement would be friendlier to our objective as it would not shake the can or the machine itself with disruptive vibrations. Also, we would have to use materials with a good grade of force absorption to eradicate the transmission of the movement to the rest of the structure. Allowing the reduction of the shaking forces while maintaining it effective in the process of mixing.
Answer:
Numbers 4, 6, & 7 are correct
Explanation:
4- this allows the op amp to have zero voltage so that maximum voltage is transferred to output load.
6- this ensures that op amp doesn't cause loading in the original circuit, high input impedance would not deter the circuit from pulling current from it.
7- high difference between upper and lower frequencies.
Answer:
Fuel efficiency for highway = 114.08 miles/gallon
Fuel efficiency for city = 98.79 miles/gallon
Explanation:
1 gallon = 3.7854 litres
1 mile = 1.6093 km
Let's first convert the efficiency to km/gallon:
48.5 km/litre = (48.5 * 3.7854) km/gallon
48.5 km/litre = 183.5919 km/gallon (highway)
42.0 km/litre = (42.0 * 3.7854) km/gallon
42.0 km/litre = 158.9868 km/gallon (city)
Next, we convert these to miles/gallon:
183.5919 km/gallon = (183.5919 / 1.6093) miles/gallon
183.5919 km/gallon = 114.08 miles/gallon (highway)
158.9868 km/gallon = (158.9868 /1.6093) miles/gallon
158.9868 km/gallon = 98.79 miles/gallon (city)
Answer:
Mechanical Efficiency = 83.51%
Explanation:
Given Data:
Pressure difference = ΔP=1.2 Psi
Flow rate = 
Power of Pump = 3 hp
Required:
Mechanical Efficiency
Solution:
We will first bring the change the units of given data into SI units.
Now we will find the change in energy.
Since it is mentioned in the statement that change in elevation (potential energy) and change in velocity (Kinetic Energy) are negligible.
Thus change in energy is
As we know that Mass = Volume x density
substituting the value
Energy = Volume * density x ΔP / density
Change in energy = Volumetric flow x ΔP
Change in energy = 0.226 x 8.274 = 1.869 KW
Now mechanical efficiency = change in energy / work done by shaft
Efficiency = 1.869 / 2.238
Efficiency = 0.8351 = 83.51%
Answer:
The outer diameter of the spacers that yields the most economical and safe design is 25.03 mm
Explanation:
For steel bolt
Stress = 210 MPa or 210 N/mm2
Pressure = Stress* Area
Pbolt = 210 N/mm2 * 16^2 *(pi)/4
Pbolt = 210 N/mm2 * 200.96 mm^2 = 42201.6 N
For Brass spacer
Pressure = 42201.6 N
Area of Brass spacer = Pressure/Stress
Area of Brass spacer = 42201.6 N/145 N/mm^2 = 291.044 mm^2
Area of Brass spacer = (pi) (d^2 - 16^2)/4 = 291.044 mm^2
d^2 - 16^2 = 291.044 mm^2* 4/(pi) = 370.758
d^2 = 370.758 + 16^2
d^2 = 626.758
d = 25.03 mm
The outer diameter of the spacers that yields the most economical and safe design is 25.03 mm
