Dred Scott Vs. Stanford case was heard in Supreme court of US which issued its final ruling saying that Africans whether free or slaves were not the citizens of US.
Explanation:
Dred Scott who is a plaintiff and a slave was bought by John Emerson in Missouri. Later Emerson came along with Dred Scott to Illinois where Scott married and as they were returning to Missouri, Emerson died. Now Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom in the federal court. He claimed he was free as he lived in the free state.
Robert Taney who was the chief justice issued the land mark decision that African american though free or slave were not the citizen of US and hence Dred Scott had no right to sue in the federal court. Dred Scott lost his case and this ruling was condemned universally as one of the racism based verdicts which paved way for the amendments of the statutes pertaining to the rights of African Americans.
Because the very purpose for studying is to make children who are unable to solve the math problem to become able.
By denying them the opportunity to learn simply because they are deemed not smart enough will even preventing them further from understanding the math topics.
Answer:
b. they built an irrigation system for farming.
Explanation:
The irrigation system is something big and permanent, made by populations that decided to stabilize and live in the region where the irrigation system was established. This is because, this population wants to start agricultural activities and plant crops that need long times (often) to generate food. In other words, the implantation of an irrigation system means the establishment of agriculture, which is a common characteristic of the population that does not intend to change regions.
In this regard, historians know that the settlers of San Antonio de Bexar intended to make it a permanent settlement because they implemented an irrigation system in the region.
Answer:The evangelical converts
Explanation:
