leadershipCorrect/Complete Question:
Your company's HR director is a believer in trait theories of leadership. He believes that he can differentiate leaders from nonleaders by focusing on personal qualities and characteristics. The HR director plans to promote Lawrence, a highly extraverted manager with a great deal of ambition and energy to the position of VP, Manufacturing. He asks for your expertise in helping him to apply trait theory to leadership selection within your company. The director believes that because of his innate characteristics, Lawrence will be highly effective at helping the company achieve its production goals. You advise the director against basing his decision purely on traits because ________.
A) research has identified emotional stability as the strongest predictor of leadership effectiveness
B) studies have found that the Big Five traits are difficult to identify in leaders
C) studies have shown that traits are poor predictors of leadership effectiveness
D) research has found that conscientiousness is a better predictor of effectiveness than extraversion
E) research has shown that effective managers are often unlikely to become effective leaders
Answer:
C, studies have shown that traits are poor predictors of leadership effectiveness
Explanation:
As much as traits can help predict leaders from non leaders, it is not adequate to distinguish the effectiveness or lack of it as a leader.
In the case of the above question, it is proper to advise the HR against making Lawrence a VP for manufacturing becase just his traits won't be enough to efficiently discharge his duties in that role.
Cheers. i hope this helps
The agricultural worker that cuts down trees with chain-saws is a lumberjack.
Answer:
5.47%
Explanation:
The computation of yield to maturity is shown in the attachment:
Given that
FV = $1000
PV = ($980)
PMT = 5% ÷ 2 × 1,000 = $25
Number of years = 5 years × 2 = 10 Years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying the above formula, the yield to maturity is
= 2.73 × 2
= 5.46%
Therefore with the help of spreadsheets (as attached), we could explain in a better manner.
