how each of these "w"? im guessing it means work. and three weapons from then that are "new"? are:
Rifles. All nations used more than one type of firearm during the First World War. The rifles most commonly used by the major combatants were, among the Allies, the Lee-Enfield .303 (Britain and Commonwealth), Lebel and Berthier 8mm (France), Mannlicher–Carcano M1891, 6.5mm (Italy), Mosin–Nagant M1891 7.62 (Russia), and Springfield 1903 .30–06 (USA). The Central Powers employed Steyr–Mannlicher M95 (Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria), Mauser M98G 7.92mm (Germany), and Mauser M1877 7.65mm (Turkey). The American Springfield used a bolt-action design that so closely copied Mauser’s M1989 that the US Government had to pay a licensing fee to Mauser, a practice that continued until America entered the war.
Machine guns. Most machine guns of World War 1 were based on Hiram Maxim’s 1884 design. They had a sustained fire of 450–600 rounds per minute, allowing defenders to cut down attacking waves of enemy troops like a scythe cutting wheat. There was some speculation that the machine gun would completely replace the rifle. Contrary to popular belief, machine guns were not the most lethal weapon of the Great War. That dubious distinction goes to the artillery.
Flamethrowers. Reports of infantry using some sort of flame-throwing device can be found as far back as ancient China. During America’s Civil War some Southern newspapers claimed Abraham Lincoln had observed a test of such a weapon. But the first recorded use of hand-held flamethrowers in combat was on February 26, 1915, when the Germans deployed the weapon at Malancourt, near Verdun. Tanks carried on a man’s back used nitrogen pressure to spray fuel oil, which was ignited as it left the muzzle of a small, hand-directed pipe. Over the course of the war, Germany utilized 3,000 Flammenwerfer troops; over 650 flamethrower attacks were made. The British and French both developed flame-throwing weapons but did not make such extensive use of them.
there are many more, but here are 3 i found from a trustworthy source!
Answer:
Instructions are listed below
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Condelezza Co. expects to produce 10,000 units of Product A and 20,000 units of Product B in the coming year.
Budgeted factory overhead costs for the coming year are:
Assembly $310,000
Finishing 240,000
Total $550,000
The machine hours expected to be used in the coming year are as follows:
Assembly Dept.
Product A 15,100
Product B 4,900
Total 20,000
Finishing Dept.
Product A 9,000
Product B 11,000
Total 20,000
A) Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= 550,000/40,000= $13.75 per machine hour
B) Departamental rates:
Assembly= 310,000/20,000= $15.5 per machine hour.
Finishing= 240,000/20,000= $12 per machine hour.
Answer:
a. To increase Land - Debit
b. To decrease Cash - Credit
c. To increase Fees Earned (Revenues) - Credit
d. To increase Office Expense - Debit
e. To decrease Unearned Revenue - Debit
f. To decrease Prepaid Rent - Credit
g. To increase Notes Payable - Credit
h. To decrease Accounts Receivable - Credit
i. To increase Common Stock - Credit
j. To increase Store Equipment - Debit
Explanation:
Debit gives details of spending, sum owed , amount to balance which is usually recorded to the left side of an account entry book while credit gives the details of income, amount earned or made on sale, spending cut and revenue and is usually placed to the right hand column of an account entry.
Answer: what to expect in an interview session
Explanation:) because good person-organization fit is linked to higher task performance, better work attitudes, lower intentions to quit, and less job stress; and
(2) because showing up at an interview having done your research shows recruiters that you took the time to learn about the business and prepares you to ask good questions. The goal of this exercise is to challenge your knowledge of the seven things you should learn about acompany before showing up for an interview . Every Recruiter expect that you know what you are doing and also brush yourself up with information on your Resume and the company in question
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
