1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
worty [1.4K]
3 years ago
7

True or false: When an object becomes polarized, it acquires a charge and becomes a charged object.​

Physics
1 answer:
PSYCHO15rus [73]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

i think its true

Explanation:

You might be interested in
There is less difference between the speed of light in glass and the speed of light in water than there is between the speed of
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer: no, the magnifying glass has nothing to do with the speed of light.

Explanation: When light moves between 2 media (refraction), part of it properties that changes during this process is it speed.

The change in speed is dependent on the refractive index of the 2 media and as given by snell's law, the refractive index is inversely proportional to wave speed.

This implies that moving from dense to a more dense medium reduces wave speed and moving from dense to less dense medium increases wave speed.

For the first statement, light moved from glass to water, it implies that it moves from a dense to a less dense medium, it wave speed increases in water.

For the second statement, light moved from glass to air, it implies that it also moves from a dense to a less dense medium and it wave speed will also increase in air.

Looking at both second medium, for the first statement, the second medium is water, and for the second statement, the second medium is air.

Air is less dense that water, hence light travel faster in air than in water.

Thus we can see that the magnification property of a glass has nothing to do with the wave speed, just the refractive indices of the media.

8 0
3 years ago
For what angle of incidence at the first mirror will this ray strike the midpoint of the second mirror (which is s=29.0cm long)
Lesechka [4]

The question is missing a diagram of the ray reflection. I attached a diagram which comes from a similar question in the answer section. The full question should be as follows:

Two plane mirrors intersect at right angles. A laser beam strikes the first of them at a point d = 10.0cmfrom their point of intersection, as shown in the figure. For what angle of incidence at the first mirror will this ray strike the midpoint of the second mirror (which is s=29.0cm long) after reflecting from the first mirror?

Answer:

34.6°

Explanation:

To strike the midpoint of the second mirror, the ray light will have to travel half of the distance vertically

i.e. 29/2 = 14.5

We can solve this through trigonometry.

Let the angle between the ray and the vertical plane mirror is known as α

tan α = 10/14.5

α = tan^{-1} (10/14.5) = 34.6°

The angle of incidence is the angle between the ray and the normal line of the mirror.

Let angle of incidence of first mirror be β

β = α = 34.6

6 0
3 years ago
When I bump the table, the coffee in my cup spilled out. Newton's _____ law explains this reaction.
Ivan
When I bump the table, the coffee in my cup spilled out. Newton's 1st law explains this reaction.

Answer: A) or the first option.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is true when an object of mass m moving on a horizontal frictionless surface hits and sticks to an object
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

c)

Explanation:

A collision is said to be elastic when the total kinetic energy is the same after the collision. The speed of objects that are stuck together will always be less than the initial speed of the object that was in motion given that the other particle was at rest. It is because the kinetic energy of the system was due to the moving object. The objects have a greater overall mass when they are stuck. If the kinetic energy is the same and the mass increases, the velocity must decrease.

3 0
3 years ago
Assuming all object are moving with the same velocity, witch statement describes the object with the largest intertia?
Kisachek [45]

Answer:

Mass is the quantitative measure of inertia of any object.

Explanation:

The object that have largest mass will   have largest inertia as well as largest momentum.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The number of significant figures in 10001 is<br> two.<br> five.<br> three.<br> six.
    15·2 answers
  • The drawing shows an edge-on view of two planar surfaces that intersect and are mutually perpendicular. Surface (1) has an area
    10·1 answer
  • -<br> Speed is a scalar, a quantity that is<br> described by<br> alone.
    8·1 answer
  • What is the velocity of a car that has traveled 500 miles northeast in 5 hours
    5·2 answers
  • Mendeleev noticed that if he organized the elements by atomic weight certain patterns emerged. For instance, elements in the sam
    12·2 answers
  • A kettle heats 1.75 kg of water. The specific latent heat of vaporisation of water is 3.34 x 106 J/kg. How much energy would be
    7·1 answer
  • As it travels through a crystal, a light wave is described by the function E(x,t)=Acos[(1.57×107)x−(2.93×1015)t]. In this expres
    13·1 answer
  • An object is moving east, and its velocity
    10·1 answer
  • a rock of mass of 540 g in the air is found to have an apparent mass of 342 g when submerged in water (a) calculate the weight o
    8·1 answer
  • During an experiment, an object is placed on a disk that rotates about an axle through its center, as shown in Figure 1. The dis
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!