Answer: Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct option: A $50 billion decrease in government spending would be the most contractionary fiscal policy.
A. Increase the taxes by $40 billion is also a contractionary fiscal policy but it doesn't have a greater impact than decreasing the government spending by $50 billion.
B. It is an expansionary fiscal policy.
D. There are both expansionary fiscal policy by decreasing taxes by $10 billion and contractionary fiscal policy by decreasing government spending by $40 billion. But it doesn't have much impact as the option (C) is having.
Therefore, Option (C) is having the most contractionary fiscal policy.
Answer: $150,000
Explanation:
Seeing as the litigation expense will only be paid in 2018, it should be added back to income for 2015.
= 900,000 + 100,000
= $1,000,000
As the depreciation will reverse evenly over the next three years and with future income probable, it should be removed from income.;
= 1,000,000 - 300,000
= $700,000
Municipal Bonds have the advantage of being Tax-exempt so their interest income should be removed to calculate how much tax should be paid.
= 700,000 - 200,000
= $500,000
2015 Income Tax Payable = 500,000 * 30%
= $150,000
Answer: This scenario demonstrates the PERISHABILITY quality of services.
Explanation: A Service Organisation can be defined as an organisation that practice the provision of such a service as economic activity.
Some of the qualities of Services include; variability; perishability; heterogeneity etc.
The perishability quality of service refers to the fact that services cannot be stored, warehoused, or inventoried and, therefore, are perishable.
