Answer: a) $(11.3) million
b)$1,286.7million
c)$40.6 million
Explanation:This does not involve lengthy explanation.
(a) Other comprehensive income for 2017 =unrealized holding loss =available-for-sale securities during the year= $(11.3) million
(b) Comprehensive income for 2017= net income-unrealized holding loss =
$1,286.7million (1,298 - 11.3)
(c) Accumulated other comprehensive income = accumulated other comprehensive income -unrealized holding loss
$40.6 million (51.9 - 11.3)
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Accept the USA distributor demand. It is even better for Tetsu compared to Japan.
Explanation:
Considering both the distributors in Japan and the U.S. request a 20% margin for the retails of Tetsu's devices, accepting the offer of the U.S. company represents a good deal. Businesses are not handled the same in Japan and the U.S. Both countries have different policies. Tetsu must consider that the U.S. is a bigger market and that its devices are imported in the U.S., implying there could be tariffs imposed. Tough, if the U.S. distributor requests the same margin a Japanese distributor does to start businesses, <em>the deal will be in Tetsu's favor</em>.
Answer:
The agency collected $ 622.5.
Explanation:
Since HRH Collection Agency keeps a collection fee of 25% of any amounts collected, to determine how much did the agency collect on a bad debt if the agency forwarded $ 2490 to a client, the following calculation must be performed:
2490 x 0.25 = X
622.5 = X
Therefore, the agency collected $ 622.5.
Answer:
$183,600
Explanation:
Since the expected useful life of the patent is only 10 years, instead of 20 years, its cost should be amortized in 10 years. That means that for every year that passes, Northern has to amortize $20,400 (= $204,000 / 10). Only one year passed between September 30, 2019 and October 1, 2018, so the patent's account on the balance sheet is $183,600 (= $204,000 - $20,400).
Answer:
D. $96,000
Explanation:
We will allocate the cost on maintenance by first stablishing a rate per maintenence hour:
As this is direct method we aren''t doing an allocation to other service department we directly allocate against production department A and B
total hours: 480 + 320 = 800
160,000 total cost /800 hours = 200 per hour
Department B hours: 480
allocate to department B: 480 x 200 = 96,000
