Answer:
Purchasing
Explanation:
In the purchasing function, the company purchased the products and services from the manufacturer at a lesser cost and then sell the goods at higher prices in order to earn the profit.
When someone purchases, when the price is less and quality is best as compared with the competitors dealing in the same industry
Therefore in the given case, Cedric Stein orders aluminum component parts that are used in the Audi card production so here the purchasing function is used
1.) Out of the choices given here, a computer game that can be purchased online and played right away has good time utility. The other choices didn't seem to be a good fit for this particular question. The correct answer is D.
2.) Hours of labor or the number of workers are common ways of measuring a company's division of labor. The correct answer is A, division of labor.
Answer:
D. 8 percent interest for 9 years
Explanation:
We would use the formula future value formula below to determine which of the investment options would double her money:
FV=PV*(1+r)^n
PV is the amount invested which is $1000
r is the interest rate expected to be earned while n is the number of years First option:
FV=$1000*(1+6%)^3
FV=$1,191.02
Second option:
FV=$1000*(1+12%)^5
FV=$1,762.34
Third option:
FV=$1000*(1+7%)^9
FV=$ 1,838.46
Fourth option:
FV=$1000*(1+8%)^9
FV=$2000
Last option:
FV=$1000*(1+6%)^10
FV=$ 1,790.85
Answer: $30,000
Explanation:
In accounting, the treatment of the Sale and Operating Leaseback operation is such that a gain is only recognized if the sales price is more than the fair value. In such a case the difference between the fair value and the carrying price is considered the Gain on Sale.
The Difference between the sales price and the fair value is to be amortized over the period of use.
Seeing as the selling price is more than the fair value, the Gain on Sale is therefore,
= Fair Value - Carrying Value
= 310,000 - 280,000
= $30,000
$30,000 is the amount of gain on sale of the property recognized by Alla on January 1, Year 1.
<span>The correct answer is that it depends on the specifics of the incentive plan. A general incentive plan that is not linked directly to productivity will typically become old news to staff within a few years. What was once an incentive will become familiar and may be viewed as an entitlement as staff start looking for the eternal "what's next?".
An incentive directly linked to some kind of productivity (e.g. hours worked) will have a far longer shelf life (though this will, of course, vary by employee). In this scenario the ongoing incentive remains year over year (e.g. the hours of overtime worked in the previous year will have no bearing on the current year so if you want a similar result you will need to maintain your effort whereas if you want a better result you will have to increase your effort).
All incentive plans, however, are subject to the rules of diminishing marginal utility to the employees and will diminish over time as the employee either becomes comfortable at a certain productivity level or becomes disenchanted by other factors.
In summation: an incentive plan, if designed properly, can work for a relatively long period of years though results may vary by employee as everyone is motivated by different things (though providing an alternative incentive to money may somewhat mitigate this additional potential problem).</span>
