Cheaper pricing, more attractive loyalty programmes, more convenient delivery options and better product range.
Explanation:
A website asked participants how much their average spending online is invested. Results suggest Amazon Prime subscribers buy more money overall; U.S. Prime affirms doing 53 percent of their online shopping, while Non-Prime members invest 50 percent in the United Kingdom.
As internet customers in general, they spoke to Prime members about Amazon being too strong, with 61% of British members and 69% of American Prime members claiming that they are worried with Amazon's increasing and stifling competition. Amazon is a big player.
The main reasons they asked for Amazon were: lower prices, more loyalty rewards, more flexible shipping choices and better product selection.
Prime Members quoted the main reasons they should choose another store over Amazon. In the United States 26% and in the United Kingdom 18% have reported that they enjoy interactions in-store.
Answer:
d. $119.32
Explanation:
The computation of the total of leiff online purchase is shown below:
= Video game price - discount + sales tax + shipping fee
where,
Video game price is $128
The discount = Video game price × discount percentage
= $128 ×15%
= $19.2
The sales tax = (Video game price - discount) × sales tax rate
= ($128 - $19.2) ×5.3%
= $5.77
And, the shipping fee is $4.75
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $128 - $19.2 + $5.77 + $4.75
= $119.32
<span>Hours of labor or number of workers are common ways of measuring a company's_______?
</span><span>
Productivity
</span>
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
<u><em>1. Likely the price of the stock either goes up or falls</em></u>
<u><em>2. There is no need for a stop loss order in this scenario.</em></u>
<u><em>3. 5412541.2</em></u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
1. Stock market prices are often unstable, prices can be up today, the next day they are low.
2. Arianna has already made over 100% profit from the stock since she purchased at a good low price, yesterday's stock close price was still profit for her.
3. A 10% Stop loss price would have been the idea order price rather than the $53.7353.73.
4. Remember Stop loss order are meant to reduce or minimize the loss of investor or trader, a <em>calculated level </em>of should be carefully decided.
