1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gulaghasi [49]
3 years ago
8

It's easy to understand why third-graders might not refuse to obey their teacher, but when the exercise is done with the prison

guards, why don't any of the adults object?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Ymorist [56]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The children have to fear for they parents, and just want to be accepted. Adults have their own vision of the world, and if something goes agains that, it is likely that they do not obey.

Explanation:

It has a lot to do with reputation, and fear of your parents for the children and reputation for the adults.

For example, in the third grade, if you do not obey your teacher, your parents are likely to be called, and they may punish you. As a children you just want to be accepted and avoid problems, so you obey.

In the prison you're now an adult, with your opinions and vision of the world, not worried about being accepted and avoid problems. So if something happens that you do not agree, you end up not backing down, that is, not obeying the prison guards.

You might be interested in
In North Korea, the Kim dynasty has been elevated to a quasi-religious status, and citizens are expected to keep pictures of the
Y_Kistochka [10]

This is an example of the apotheosis of  popular leader.

Explanation:

The apotheosis of the Kim family in the dictatorship of north Korea is a symptomatic example of a autocracy  which is completely run in the power of one person and the one person only who can decide all courses of action for the country by his own.

This person and his family that inherits the title from him is wont to be worshiped for him to be able to govern the kind of respect to consolidate his power in Korea as he does.

8 0
3 years ago
Why were Americans upset with Great Britain before the War of 1812? A. Great Britain closed its own ports but kept French ports
topjm [15]

The correct answer is: C) Great Britain's navy captured American sailors before the war began.

Because of the conflict between Great Britain and Napoleon Bonaparte's France, both countries tried to block the United States from trading with the other, which damaged and angered Americans deeply. Later on, to make things much worse, the Royal Navy of Great Britain took American sailors into the marine forces without notice to fight on its behalf. Both of these causes ultimately led to President James Madison's Declaration of War upon the British.

8 0
4 years ago
PLS HELP IT'S DUE TODAY!!!
Luden [163]

Answer:

C- Water helps trees and plants grow for food, and provides resting places in the desert.

Explanation:

Merchants and traders who travel along desert routes must stop at oases to replenish food and water supplies. This means that whoever controls an oasis also controls the trade along the route—making oases desirable to political, economic, and military leaders.

6 0
3 years ago
When Katie was making a cake using a new recipe, she mistakenly used some of the ingredients from an old recipe she had used oft
slavikrds [6]

Answer:

proactive; retroactive

Explanation:

Proactive interference: The term proactive interference refers to the process when an individual's old memories hinder him or her from retaining new memories.

Retroactive interference: The term retroactive interference refers to the process when an individual's new memories hinder him or her from retaining old memories. In other words, the new memories of a person disrupts the old memories.

In the question above, Katie is experiencing proactive interference, whereas Laurel is experiencing retroactive interference.

4 0
3 years ago
_____ refer to our beliefs about what is right vs. wrong, good vs. evil, virtuous vs. corrupt.
Norma-Jean [14]

<u>Ethics and morals</u> refer to our beliefs about what is right vs. wrong, good vs. evil, virtuous vs. corrupt. Read more about ethics and morals.

<h3>What are considered as standard ethics and morals?</h3>

Ethics and morals conform to “right” and “wrong” conduct. While they can be used interchangeably, they are as well different.

<h3>What are the differences in ethics and morals?</h3>

Ethics refer to rules provided by an external source, e.g., codes of conduct in workplaces or principles in religions. Moral, on the other hand, refer to an individual's own principles regarding right and wrong.

Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.

learn more about ethics and morals: brainly.com/question/1326871

#SPJ12

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What event created the belief that formal education was essential to the well-being of society? the American Revolution the indu
    15·1 answer
  • Who was the supreme commander of allied troops during the final year of world war 2 ?
    7·2 answers
  • When the government lowers taxes —
    13·1 answer
  • Which two plans were able to break the stalemate in Congress in deciding how the states would be represented in the new federal
    7·1 answer
  • What were the two categories of slaves nd witch one was better and why
    13·2 answers
  • I bring war but i also bring love,
    9·2 answers
  • The population of desert tortoises in Targland’s Red Desert has declined, partly because they are captured for sale as pets and
    11·1 answer
  • State Bank of Pakistan's ‘PomPak – Learn to Earn’ is Pakistan’s first e-learning financial literacy game. What would you do to e
    15·1 answer
  • What are the dangers of social insecurity​
    11·2 answers
  • In cities such as ___________—the Congo's capital—poverty is everywhere.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!