The point of the experiment has been foiled by the choice to hand water one group and use sprinklers on the other. Whether talking to the plant or not did anything can't be proven because of this. If the student were to try to publish this experiment and the outcomes. Critics would be able to use the unequal treatment in water supply as a reason to discredit his/her experiment and dismiss the claims. When performing an experiment like this it is very important to treat each side as equal as possible.
Answer and Explanation:
Observing population directly gives you accurate result .
Direct observation does not need any intermediary as they themselves go for survey.
So, it is cost efficient.
Whereas indirect observing may involve manipulations.
It requires someone or many to hire who helps in surveying.
It incurs cost.
Thus, direct observation is always better than indirect observation.
It is true that rivers and streams are biodiverse ecosystems that are sensitive to change. Details about rivers and streams can be found below.
<h3>What is river and stream?</h3>
A river is a large and often winding stream which drains a land mass, carrying water down from higher areas to a lower point, oftentimes ending in another body of water, such as an ocean or in an inland sea.
On the other hand, a stream is a small river or a body of moving water confined by banks.
Rivers and streams are both freshwater ecosystems, hence, tend to respond to changes in their environment caused by anthropogenic activities.
Therefore, it is true that rivers and streams are biodiverse ecosystems that are sensitive to change.
Learn more about rivers and streams at: brainly.com/question/10904801
#SPJ4
A. Competition amoumg large predatora
Answer:
(Not wanting to spend or use something)
Explanation:
Like someone or something really cheap, not wanting to use something in a way that it is a waste.
A man's car broke down, he didn't want to spend any money repairing it so he did it himself.
Or could just mean being careful with your resources.
