Answer:
B) lockout
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned the manufacturing Peterson and the local steelworkers contain the negotiation breakdown also is keep out of the work place and runs the operations with non permanenet replacements
So here to overcome this breakdown, the lockout strategy is used
And all other given options are wrong.
Answer:
A. Reject (Alternative 1) $0.00
Accept (Alternative 2) $1.12
Differentials Effect on income (Alternative 2) $1.12
B. Accepted (Alternative 2)
Explanation:
a. Preparation of a differential analysis dated March 16 on whether to reject (Alternative 1) or accept (Alternative 2) the special order.
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Reject (Alternative 1) or Accept (Alternative 2)
March 16
Reject Accept Differentials Effect on income
(Alternative 1) (Alternative 2) (Alternative 2)
Revenue per unit $0.00 $7.20 $7.20
Costs:
Variable manufacturing costs per unit
$0.00 -$5.00 -$5.00
Export tariff per unit
$0.00 -$1.08 -$1.08
($7.20*15%=$1.08)
Income (Loss) per unit $0.00 $1.12 $1.12
b. Based on the above differential analysis
the special order should be ACCEPTED (Alternative 2).
Answer: The invisible hand
Explanation: Invisible hand can be defined as those unobservable market forces which helps the forces of demand and supply to reach to an equilibrium level.
In the given case, Daniel is giving work to local suppliers and jobs to residents as well as producing demand in the market by its products, thus, we can conclude that the given case is an example of invisible hand.