Answer:
Based on the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion, there is convincing statistical evidence that he is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The proportion from the sample of people from his party that support the law = 70%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 550 people
The proportion from the sample of people from the other party that support the law = 65%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 420 people
The confidence level of the test = 95%
The given confidence interval for the difference in proportion, C.I. = (-0.010, 0.110)
Given that the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion ranges from -0.010, to 0.110, it is 95% certain that 0 is among the likely difference in proportion between the two populations and therefore, there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that there is no difference in the proportion of the members of either political that support the proposed new traffic law.
Answer:
We conclude that If Tawnee increases the length and width of the playground by a scale factor of 2, the perimeter of the new playground will be twice the perimeter of the original playground.
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that the perimeter of a rectangle = 2(l+w)
i.e.
P = 2(l+w)
Here
Given that the length and width of the playground by a scale factor of 2
A scale factor of 2 means we need to multiply both length and width by 2.
i.e
P = 2× 2(l+w)
P' = 2 (2(l+w))
= 2P ∵ P = 2(l+w)
Therefore, we conclude that If Tawnee increases the length and width of the playground by a scale factor of 2, the perimeter of the new playground will be twice the perimeter of the original playground.
We must recall that a horizontal asymptote is the value/s of y that the given function approaches to but never reaches. To find this in a rational function, we compare the expressions with highest degree in the numerator and denominator. There are three possible outcome when this happens.
1. if the highest degree (highest exponent) in the numerator is bigger than that of the denominator, then there won't be any horizontal asymptote.
2. if the highest degree in the denominator is bigger, then the horizontal symptote would be y = 0.
3. if they have the same highest degree, then we just get the quotient of their coefficient.
Now, going back to our function, we have

From this we can see that the highest degree in the numerator is 1 (from 2x) and 2 (from x²) for the denominator. Clearly, it shows that its denominator has a higher degree. And from our discussion, we can conclude that the horizontal asymptote would be y = 0.
Answer: y = 0
Speed = distance ÷ time so it's probably
35÷120=0.291 or 7/24 miles per hour