B. The other choices all happen at some point in the rotation but you want to maximize the flux and then rotate it as fast as possible
Answer:
Nucleus A with 7 protons and 7 neutrons and Nucleus C with 7 protons and 5 neutrons are isotopes of the same elements
Explanation:
Isotopes are elements that have the same atomic structure but different molecular structure. An atom that has the same atomic number but different mass number are known to be isotopes.
The proton of an atom is the same as its atomic number while the sum of the proton and neutron is equal to its mass number.
According to the question, nuclei that has the same number of proton are isotopes of the same element. Therefore nuclei A and C with 7 protons each are isotopes of the same element since they have the same atomic number i.e number of proton = atomic number.
Their atomic masses of nuclei A and C are 14 and 12 respectively
Answer:
2274 J/kg ∙ K
Explanation:
The complete statement of the question is :
A lab assistant drops a 400.0-g piece of metal at 100.0°C into a 100.0-g aluminum cup containing 500.0 g of water at 15 °C. In a few minutes, she measures the final temperature of the system to be 40.0°C. What is the specific heat of the 400.0-g piece of metal, assuming that no significant heat is exchanged with the surroundings? The specific heat of this aluminum is 900.0 J/kg ∙ K and that of water is 4186 J/kg ∙ K.
= mass of metal = 400 g
= specific heat of metal = ?
= initial temperature of metal = 100 °C
= mass of aluminum cup = 100 g
= specific heat of aluminum cup = 900.0 J/kg ∙ K
= initial temperature of aluminum cup = 15 °C
= mass of water = 500 g
= specific heat of water = 4186 J/kg ∙ K
= initial temperature of water = 15 °C
= Final equilibrium temperature = 40 °C
Using conservation of energy
heat lost by metal = heat gained by aluminum cup + heat gained by water
![m_{m} c_{m} (T_{mi} - T) = m_{a} c_{a} (T - T_{ai}) + m_{w} c_{w} (T - T_{wi} ) \\(400) (100 - 40) c_{m} = (100) (900) (40- 15) + (500) (4186) (40 - 15)\\ c_{m} = 2274 Jkg^{-1}K^{-1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=m_%7Bm%7D%20c_%7Bm%7D%20%28T_%7Bmi%7D%20-%20T%29%20%3D%20m_%7Ba%7D%20c_%7Ba%7D%20%28T%20-%20T_%7Bai%7D%29%20%2B%20m_%7Bw%7D%20c_%7Bw%7D%20%28T%20-%20T_%7Bwi%7D%20%29%20%5C%5C%28400%29%20%28100%20-%2040%29%20c_%7Bm%7D%20%3D%20%28100%29%20%28900%29%20%2840-%2015%29%20%2B%20%28500%29%20%284186%29%20%2840%20-%2015%29%5C%5C%20c_%7Bm%7D%20%3D%202274%20Jkg%5E%7B-1%7DK%5E%7B-1%7D)
No. I do not agree with Stefan. Quite the contrary. I disagree
with his description of "<span>angle of incidence" as the angle between
the surface of the mirror and the incoming ray.
The correct description of "angle of incidence" is </span><span>the angle between
the NORMAL TO the surface of the mirror and the incoming ray.
Thus, the true angle of incidence is the complement of the angle that
Stefan calculates or measures.</span>