Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty
Explanation:
Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.
The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.
Answer:
The answer is sadly Donald Trump But I wish the correct answer would be the picture I circled in red
Explanation:
C. Jurisdiction because they are the ones you keep everything in place while in court, they have and declare the judgment in the end and are to listen and apply the laws so nobody gets declared with a unfair law for which they’re the ones who have this power
Answer:
Federal District Court
Explanation:
The first case would likely start in the Federal District Court and could be appealed to the State Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court. As seen in <em>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. </em>the school district which suspended a girl for vulgar speech off school grounds started their case in the federal court of Middle District of Pennsylvania and eventually appealed all the way to the Supreme Court.
Edit: <em>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. </em>did not appeal to the State Supreme Court likely because the First Amendment is a federal law and not state law.
