Answer:
Change in M1 $400
Changd in M2 $0
Explanation:
The money which is been held by individuals in savings accounts is part of the M2 money supply, but its not part ofthe M1 money supply.
Hence when Jane withdraws $400 cash from her savings account,the M1 money supply will increases by $400. However, the M2 money supply does not tend to change reason been that the M1 money supply is included as part of the M2 money
Change in M1 $400
Changd in M2 $0
Answer: Entrepreneurial leadership.
Explanation:
Anna is an Entrepreneurial leader, that is ever ready to take sensible risks and study the market trends to quickly identify changes in the market. An entrepreneurial leader is a leader that is willing to take risks to gain new achievements and is always identifying ways of improving themselves and team they lead.
Answer:
PV= $9,355.78
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
If $ 9,000 is invested in a certain business at the start of the year, the investor will receive $ 2,700 at the end of each of the next four years.
Interest rate= 6%.
First, we need to find the final value
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= payment
FV= {2,700*[(1.06^4)-1]}/0.06= 11,811.46
Now, we calculate the present value:
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 11,811.46/1.06^4= $9,355.78
Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
