Answer:
most likely that (2) the replicated experiment was performed incorrectly.
Why, u ask? u dare question me:
1- The initial experiment invalidness cannot be proven.
2- <em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>t</u></em>
3- Different labaratories does not effect the outcome, as long as the parameter and environment of the replicated experiment is the same as when the initial experiment was conducted.
4- Already knowing the data and errors would increase the precision of the replicated experiment.
5- Change in variables should still be in the objective (or purpose) of the experiment, thus, major difference in the outcome should not happen.
happy learning!
The correct chemical formulae is CsBr
Identical electron configurations : K⁺ and Cl⁻
<h3>Further explanation </h3>
In an atom, there are levels of energy in the shell and sub-shell
This energy level is expressed in the form of electron configurations.
Charging electrons in the sub-shell uses the following sequence:
<em>1s², 2s², 2p⁶, 3s², 3p⁶, 4s², 3d¹⁰, 4p⁶, 5s², 4d¹⁰, 5p⁶, 6s², etc. </em>
S²⁻ : [Ne] 3s²3p⁶
Cl : [Ne] 3s²3p⁵
K⁺ : 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p⁶
Cl⁻ : 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s²3p⁶
S :[Ne] 3s²3p⁴
Ar : [Ne] 3s²3p⁶
Cl⁻ : 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s²3p⁶
K : 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p⁶4s¹