Provide three specific reasons referenced in his speech that explain why President Jackson supported Indian Removal.

1 answer:

7 0

Answer: He fufiilled the Removal Policy that had been introduced by Thomas Jefferson during his presidency so as to be able to seize the lands owned by Indian tribes.

The Removal Policy was part of the great movement of ethnic cleansing that struck Indians throughout the nineteenth century until the closure of the frontier in 1890. This policy was first introduced by Thomas Jefferson during the first decade of the nineteen century.

The issue of gold was for instance very important for what concerns the Cherokees. They had to be removed from their ancestral lands because gold had been found on their territory.

Removal was carried out despite the efforts of the five Southeastern tribes(Choctaw, Chickasaw, Cherokee, Seminoles and Creeks) to assimilate to white man's life.

<h2><u>please mark brainliest</u></h2>

You might be interested in

Who were the sons of liberty?

hammer [34]

Answer:

Men who fought during the civil war for freedom and the birth of this country The united states of america they are warriors of the past fighting oppression and bad rulership

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

All of the following seas are labeled on the map above except the __________ Sea

kakasveta [241]

The North Sea. Answerrrrr

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

explain what thoreau finds wrong with the majority rule. What does he say is the only obligation he has the right to assume?

Shtirlitz [24]

Explanation: Thoreau was a philosopher, writer and devotee of nature. His philosophy was based on independence, freedom of mind. He felt that the government was restricting people from taking care of themselves, their needs. He was not an anarchist but believed in minimal, almost no governmental restrictions.

He considered the rule of the majority is not good, because it implied the compulsion of having to go with the group and follow the rules of the group, which was restrictive for him. The only obligation, according to Thoreau, was to follow his conscience. That way, he would only do what he thought was right, and he would be obliged to do only what was right.

5 0

3 years ago

Is it worth having many surveillance cameras to be able to provide more safety even if it meant your privacy would be affected?

vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

Yes, it is worth having many surveillance cameras in order to provide more safety even if it meant my privacy will be affected.

Explanation:

The world is constantly changing and advancing, thus people around the world are becoming more skillful and technologically-advanced. This follows too that criminals are also becoming skillful in doing illegal activities. In order to prevent crimes from increasing, surveillance cameras should be set up in order to ward them off from doing the crime or to handle a speedy investigation of illegal activities.

Yes, privacy is also essential for me, but weighing the advantages of surveillance cameras is pivotal in ensuring that the society we're living is safe. "Privacy" would be nothing if I'd feel less safer living on Earth.

8 0

3 years ago

Factors such as climate, seasons, and holidays tend to lead to the promotional objective of:

Monica [59]

Answer:

reducing sales fluctuation

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago