1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sloan [31]
2 years ago
15

Historians disagree about the effectiveness of the New Deal. Which is not an argument historians present?

History
2 answers:
Novosadov [1.4K]2 years ago
6 0
It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question, so I had to look for it. Anyway, here is the answer. Historians disagree about the effectiveness of the New Deal. The one that is not an argument historians present is this: New Deal legislation solved the economic crisis quickly. Hope this helps.
Ber [7]2 years ago
4 0

D:New Deal legislation solved the economic crisis quickly.

You might be interested in
1.What was the only powerful institution to survive the fall of the Roman Empire?
kodGreya [7K]
The Church provided order and security. Outliving the fall of the Roman Empire.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
American settlement of the frontier affected Native Americans in all of the following ways EXCEPT:
Bess [88]

Answer: [D] Native Americans became equal partners in American policies after they moved to the reservations.

8 0
3 years ago
Which branch of the federal government did John Jay participate in?
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

Executive as Secratary of State (foriegn affairs at that time) and Judicial as the chief justice of the supreme court.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Seeing that Trump has became the first president to be impeached two times, how do you feel about a president getting impeached
TEA [102]

Answer:

Tough question to answer.

Explanation:

This is a tough question to answer. Although it is in the Senate's constitutional right to conduct an impeachment trial, the Constitution states an an impeachment is only for a sitting US president and does not have much guidance for a non-sitting US president. As of now, Donald Trump is a private citizen and therefore the impeachment may not directly effect him in the same way as a sitting US president. However, an impeachment where he is found guilty will disallow him from running for office again in the future.

Although there are many arguments and opinions to this particular subject, the current impeachment seems to be more politically motivated than actually needed.

8 0
2 years ago
Should the US have joined the League of Nations? Why or why not?
sukhopar [10]
No because the us is the us and that’s why
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the trojan war start
    9·1 answer
  • Answer one of the following questions:
    11·2 answers
  • How did Diocletian improve the military?
    11·2 answers
  • According to Justinian, what are the three areas of origin of law?
    14·2 answers
  • What were some of the areas that Christianity spread to by a.d. 325?
    15·1 answer
  • Which definition applies to the term jurisdiction?
    6·2 answers
  • 2) Common Sense written by Thomas Paine, identify two reasons why Thomas
    12·1 answer
  • What event provided an opportunity for colonies across the world to demand Independence?
    12·2 answers
  • Describe the relationship between the English and the Colonists
    12·1 answer
  • Katherine Johnson, while working with the engineers goes to get coffee, what is the name of the coffee?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!