Answer:
what.....
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Option C is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>
</h2><h3>
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Hope it is helpful....</h3>
Would it be 2.5??? I think it would but not completely sure
Answer:
∠1 ≅ ∠2 ⇒ proved down
Step-by-step explanation:
#12
In the given figure
∵ LJ // WK
∵ LP is a transversal
∵ ∠1 and ∠KWP are corresponding angles
∵ The corresponding angles are equal in measures
∴ m∠1 = m∠KWP
∴ ∠1 ≅ ∠KWP ⇒ (1)
∵ WK // AP
∵ WP is a transversal
∵ ∠KWP and ∠WPA are interior alternate angles
∵ The interior alternate angles are equal in measures
∴ m∠KWP = m∠WPA
∴ ∠KWP ≅ ∠WPA ⇒ (2)
→ From (1) and (2)
∵ ∠1 and ∠WPA are congruent to ∠KWP
∴ ∠1 and ∠WPA are congruent
∴ ∠1 ≅ ∠WPA ⇒ (3)
∵ WP // AG
∵ AP is a transversal
∵ ∠WPA and ∠2 are interior alternate angles
∵ The interior alternate angles are equal in measures
∴ m∠WPA = m∠2
∴ ∠WPA ≅ ∠2 ⇒ (4)
→ From (3) and (4)
∵ ∠1 and ∠2 are congruent to ∠WPA
∴ ∠1 and ∠2 are congruent
∴ ∠1 ≅ ∠2 ⇒ proved
You will have 40 minutes before it it’s 100% loaded
