By critically observing the two triangles, we can deduce that they: B. might not be congruent.
<h3>The properties of similar triangles.</h3>
In Geometry, two triangles are said to be similar when the ratio of their corresponding sides are equal in magnitude and their corresponding angles are congruent.
By critically observing the two triangles, we can logically deduce that the three angles of both triangles are congruent in accordance with AAA similarity postulate:
However, AAA isn't a congruence postulate and as such all similar triangles might not be congruent.
Read more on congruency here: brainly.com/question/11844452
#SPJ1
Answer:
I (even though you said not to worry about dis question) will try and answerrrrrrrrrrrrr-
I would say- hmmm- B.) II only aka A temperature increase of 1 degree Celsius is equivalent to a temperature increase of 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit.
Exponential growth of the form:
F=Ar^t
F=100(1.22)^t
F(5)=100(1.22)^5
F(5)=270.27
F(5)=270 to the nearest frog...
....
1.22=r^12
r=1.22^(1/12)
F=100(1.22^(1/12)^t)
F=100(1.22^(t/12)) now it will produce monthly populations...
Say we did the same as before but instead of 5 years you have 60 months...
F(60)=100(1.22^(60/12))
F(60)=270 to the nearest frog... :P
The reciprocal is just the fraction flipped over. 7/6 flipped is 6/7.
A) $11.63
B) 7.5% tax on something that is $11.63 would be $.87225
C) total cost with sale and tax would be $12.50
