Answer:classical conditioning is used to define and understand the behavioural response by animals and humans to certain stimulus .
It looks at the natural unconditioned stimulus that produces unconditioned responses and neutral previous stimulus that may lead to conditioned response .
What is an unconditioned stimulus this is a stimulus that triggers a reaction or response from a person or an animal without the involvement of an outside source , so it occurs naturally.
For example when one cuts an onion they get tear drop from their eyes , this occurs natural .
Onion here is referred to as an unconditioned stimulus whilst the tears that comes from your face when you cut it are referred to as unconditioned response.
You find yourself shedding those tears naturally not because you are sad or something has upset you .
Over time you may find yourself shedding those tears when you see a knife which is usually used to cut onions , a knife here is a previously neutral stimulus which now triggers a conditioned response because you know a knife is associated with cutting onion when you see it it now triggers the same response as that triggered by an unconditioned stimulus, now a knife can be referred to as a conditioned stimulus.
It is a conditioned stimulus because this reaction it cause is dependent on the fact that it is associated with the unconditioned stimulus (onion)
Explanation:
Answer:
Agents of socialization are institutions that impress social standard in indevidual ad it can include family, religion, language, teams and even the media.
Four main agents are family, school, mass media and peers.
There is no better way to start than to talk about the role of family in our social development, as family is usually considered to be the most important agent of socialization.
The next important agent of childhood socialization is the school. Of course, the official purpose of school is to transfer subject knowledge and teach life skills, such as following directions and meeting deadlines.
Peer groups give us an opportunity as children to form relationships with others on our own terms, plus learn things without the direction of an adult. Our peers have an incredible amount of infulence in our childhood.
Answer:It is certain and evident to our senses that some things are in motion. Whatever is in motion is moved by another, for a thing can be in motion only if it has a potentiality for that towards which it is being moved, while a thing moves insofar as it is actual. for motion means the reduction of something from a state of potentiality into a state of actuality. but a thing can be reduced from a state of potentiality into a state of actuality only by something already in a state of actuality. thus that which is actually hot such as fire, makes wood, which is potentially hot, to be actually hot and thereby moves and changes it. it is impossible for the same thing should be simultaneously in a state of actuality and potentiality from the same point of view, but only from different points of view. what is actually hot cannot simultaneously be only potentially hot...if that by which is put in motion is itself put in motion, then this also must be put in motion by another, and that by another again. this cannot go on to infinity, because then there would be no first mover, and consequently, no other movers-since subsequent movers only move insofar as they are put int motion by the first mover, just as the staff only moves because it is put in motion by the hand. therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover, put in motion by no other; and this everyone understands to be God.
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. The Zulu War of 1879 was an unsuccessful attempt by the Zulu nation to avoid being conquered and controlled by the British Empire. Lord Chelmsford invaded Zululand as his ultimatum was not met. Zulu king was forced to disband his army and to abandon cultural traditions.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Fiedler used to believe that the individuals or the leaders have a assertive or natural management or leadership style which is mostly defiant to the change. Under Fiedler Contingency Model, the leadership style is characterized as either relationship-motivated or task-motivated.
He also suggested that it would be better if the organization moves the individual to a better circumstance instead of changing his/her leadership style.
