Answer:
disagree, but it's your choice.
Explanation:
"Obamacare" helped many people, and was very affordable.
Drawn bow because the flexing of the bow and the increased tension in the bow string contain the energy expended by the archer’s muscles transferred to the bow. The energy is transmitted to the arrow when then it’s released
In this question, there are no options provided to choose from. So i have to answer this question based on my knowledge. I hope the answer is up to your satisfaction. The only school of economics that could be construed as advocating big governments are the Keynesians. This theory was developed during the 1930s by John Maynard Keynes.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
