1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alekssr [168]
4 years ago
14

What evidence supported the Oscillating Big Bang?

Physics
1 answer:
stira [4]4 years ago
5 0
<h2>Answer with Explanation </h2>

The Oscillating Universe Theory is a cosmological model that consolidates both the Big Bang and the Big Crunch as a major aspect of a repeating occasion. That is, in the event that this hypothesis remains constant, the Universe in which we live in exists between a Big Bang and a Big Crunch.

As such, our universe can be the first of a conceivable arrangement of universes or it tends to be the nth universe in the arrangement.

As we probably are aware, in the Big Bang Theory, the Universe is accepted to extend from a hot, exceptionally thick, and little element. Actually, on the off chance that we extrapolate back to the snapshot of the Big Bang, we can achieve a point of peculiarity described by unendingly high vitality and thickness, just as zero volume.

This portrayal would just mean a certain something every one of the laws of material science will be tossed out of the window. This is naturally unsuitable to physicists. To exacerbate the situation, a few cosmologists even trust that the Universe will, in the end, achieve the greatest purpose of development and that once this occurs, it will at that point crumple into itself.

This will basically prompt indistinguishable conditions from when we extrapolate back to the snapshot of the Big Bang. To cure this difficulty, a few researchers are suggesting that maybe the Universe won't achieve the purpose of peculiarity all things considered.

You might be interested in
.2, A car starting from rest has an acceleration of
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer: 2.5 m/s and 6.25 m

Explanation:

u = 0

a = 0.5 m/s²

t = 5 s

v = u + at

=  0 + 0.5 × 5

= <u>2.5 m/s</u>

s = ut + 1/2 at²

= 1/2 × 2.5 × 5

=<u> 6.25 m</u>

7 0
4 years ago
Which of the following factors are involved in explaining why the energy of orbitals within a principle quantum level in multiel
Citrus2011 [14]
It looks like you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question so I had to look for it. Anyway, here is the answer generally as the ℓ quantum number increases the energy is slightly higher. As a result 2s and 2p are no longer identical in energy in atoms<span> with more than one electron.</span>


Hope my answer would be a great help for you.    If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
4 0
3 years ago
If given both the speed of light in a material and an incident angle. How can you find the refracted angle?
Basile [38]

Answer:

r = Sin^{-1}\left ( \frac{v Sini}{c} \right )

Explanation:

Let the speed of light in vacuum is c and the speed of light in medium is v. Let the angle of incidence is i.

By using the definition of refractive index

refractive index of the medium is given by

n = speed of light in vacuum / speed of light in medium

n = c / v  ..... (1)

Use Snell's law

n = Sin i / Sin r

Where, r be the angle of refraction

From equation (1)

c / v = Sin i / Sin r

Sin r = v Sin i / c

r = Sin^{-1}\left ( \frac{v Sini}{c} \right )

8 0
4 years ago
a length 650 cm of thin thread wraps around a cylinder exactly 30 times calculate the circumference and the radius of the cylind
Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

circumference= 65/3  cm = 21.67 cm

radius R = 3.45 cm

Explanation:

To calculate the length of the circumference of the cylinder, we divide 650 cm by 30 (the number of times it wrapped exactly around it)

length of circumference= 65/3  cm = 21.67 cm

now use the formula of the circumference length to find the radius (R):

circumference length = 2 * pi * R

65/3 = 2 * pi * R

R = 65 / (6 pi)

R = 3.45 cm

5 0
3 years ago
Question 5 of 5: Someone texting or talking spans an average of 27 seconds after they put the phone down are still thinking abou
AVprozaik [17]
The answer is true. Distraction “latency” lasts for about 27 seconds.

This means that even after driver put down the phone or stop fooling with the navigation system; he or she isn’t fully committed with the driving task. Talking on a cell phone and texting are frequent what people associate with distracted driving, but there are so much more activities behind distracted driving.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • An object initially at rest experiences an acceleration of 9.8 m/s2 how much time will it take it to achieve a velocity of 58 m/
    15·1 answer
  • Prove that..<br>please help<br>​
    7·1 answer
  • a magnet has a 20 cm magnetic field if a piece of metal is 18 cm from the magnet will it be attracted or not
    14·1 answer
  • The formation of condensation on a glass of ice water causes the ice to melt faster than it would otherwise. If 8.55 g of conden
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following sequence of words BEST fits the following sentence?
    11·1 answer
  • Students who embrace an innate mindset might view their poor performance in math as inevitable or beyond their control
    11·2 answers
  • Help ASAP PLEASE.............:3​
    8·1 answer
  • If a riding lawnmower engine exerts 19 hp in one minute to move the mower, how much work is done? (Hint convert: 1 watt equals 0
    9·1 answer
  • Which macronutrient is made up of carbon and hydrogen elements joined together in long groups called hydrocarbons?
    12·1 answer
  • Please help its urgent 10 points!!
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!