From what I got there is one real solution :)
Rearrange the second equation to give y=2-2x, substitute into the first equation to give you a value for x and then using that you can work out y for the exact coordinates of intersection :)
Also they are both straight line graphs so they will either have one or no solutions
Hope this helped :)
The resultant graph is shown in the attached image.
Explanation:Before we begin, remember that when we multiply by a negative sign, we flip the sign of the inequality
The given inequality is:
-y ≤ 3x - 5
We will multiply both sides by -1 to get a positive y vale. This will give us:
y ≥ -3x + 5
Now, to graph the inequality, we will first draw the line y = -3x + 5 and then shade the region having y values greater than the line.
To know the region, you will simply use trial and error method for random points on the two sides of the line.
The final solution would be as shown in that attachment.
Hope this helps :)
setup a simple algebraic equation and solve.
5x = 7x-28
-5x -5x
0=2x-28
+28 +28
28=2x
Now divide both sides by 2 and you get that she is 14
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "The southern California study with a margin of error of 4.9%." the study has the smallest margin of error for a 98% confidence interval is that The southern California study with a margin of error of 4.9%.<span>
</span>
Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
Class width is said to be the difference between the upper class limit and the lower class limit consecutive classes of a grouped data. To calculate class width, this formula can be used:
CW = UCL - LCL
Where,
CW= Class width
UCL= Upper class limit
LCL= Lower class limit
From the table above:
For class 1, CW = 64 - 60 = 4
For class 2, CW = 69 - 65 = 4
For class 3, CW = 74 - 70 = 4
For class 4, CW = 79 - 75 = 4
For class 5, CW = 84 - 80 = 4
Therefore, the class width of the grouped data = 4