Answer:
The forces acting on the pen which is still on the table can have two forces acting on them. The forces are gravitational force and the equal and opposite force to the gravitational forces.
The equal and opposite forces that is applied on the pen keeps the pen still on the table.
So, the statement that no force is applied on the pen which is kept still on the table is wrong as two forces are applied on the pen.
As both the forces are equal and opposite so it is cancelled and is still.
D. It is personal in style.
Answer:
<h2>507 J</h2>
Explanation:
The kinetic energy of an object can be found by using the formula
m is the mass
v is the velocity
From the question we have
We have the final answer as
<h3>507 J</h3>
Hope this helps you
First choice: the inability of current technology to capture
large amounts of the
Sun's energy
Well, it's true that large amounts of it get away ... our 'efficiency' at capturing it is still rather low. But the amount of free energy we're able to capture is still huge and significant, so this isn't really a major problem.
Second choice: the inability of current technology to store
captured solar
energy
No. We're pretty good at building batteries to store small amounts, or raising water to store large amounts. Storage could be better and cheaper than it is, but we can store huge amounts of captured solar energy right now, so this isn't a major problem either.
Third choice: inconsistencies in the availability of the resource
I think this is it. If we come to depend on solar energy, then we're
expectedly out of luck at night, and we may unexpectedly be out
of luck during long periods of overcast skies.
Fourth choice: lack of
demand for solar energy
If there is a lack of demand, it's purely a result of willful manipulation
of the market by those whose interests are hurt by solar energy.
Answer:
Sohan told Geeta that i had done my work
