The mean is <span>29.25 but you need to round it so it would be 30 hope it helps <3</span>
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
natural
Step-by-step explanation:
natural is all better coming from a lesbian since it gives off more of your natural features without any filters or altercations. don't get me wrong if you could pull off some clean eyeliner go for it, but most people would prefer a natural girly
The measure of ∠BAF is 54°.
Solution:
DF and CE are intersecting lines.
m∠EAF = 72° and AB bisects ∠CAF.
∠EAF and ∠DAC are vertically opposite angles.
Vertical angle theorem:
<em>If two lines are intersecting, then vertically opposite angles are congruent.</em>
∠DAC ≅ ∠EAF
m∠DAC = 72°
<em>Sum of the adjacent angles in a straight line = 180°</em>
m∠DAE + m∠EAF = 180°
m∠DAE + 72° = 180°
Subtract 72° from both sides.
m∠DAE = 108°
∠CAF and ∠DAE are vertically opposite angles.
⇒ m∠CAF = m∠DAE
⇒ m∠CAF = 108°
AB bisects ∠CAF means ∠CAB = ∠BAF
m∠CAB + m∠BAF = 108°
m∠BAF + m∠BAF = 108°
2 m∠BAF = 108°
Divide by 2 on both sides, we get
m∠BAF = 54°
Hence the measure of ∠BAF is 54°.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In each case, draw the right triangle which produces the inverse trig value. That is, label the two sides as needed, and calculate the third side.
It should be clear that
sin(2α) = 2 sinα cosα
So,
See what you can do with the others.
