Answer:
c) socially constructed leadership.
Explanation:
Socially constructed leadership is a view of that suggest that leadership is constructed and produced as a result of social and relational interactions among people acting in context, it views leadership as a phenomenon constructed in interaction.
I believe the answer is: . protecting individual property rights
According to them, government does not exist to control the people that elect them. But to make sure that the people could interact with one another without resorting to act of violence. In order to fulfill this visions, establishment such as police department, criminal court, etc were created.
Answer:
During the early stages of Mongol supremacy, the empire established by Genghis absorbed civilizations in which a strong, unified, and well-organized state power had developed. The social organization of the Mongols was, however, characterized by pastoralism and a decentralized patrilineal system of clans. Antagonism existed between a society of this nature and the subjugated advanced civilizations, between a relatively small number of foreign conquerors and a numerically strong conquered population. In the early phases of conquest, the Mongols usually attempted to impose the social structure of the steppes upon their new subjects. It was customary for the Mongols to enslave a conquered tribe and to present whole communities to distinguished military leaders as a sort of personal appanage. These slaves became sooner or later an integral part of the conquering tribe. In the conquered areas a similar procedure was adopted. Groups of the settled population, usually those living in a certain territory, became the personal property of Mongol military leaders who exploited the local economic forces as they liked. No use was made of theexisting state machinery or bureaucracy, and the former political divisions were entirely disregarded. Nor was there any attempt to organize the numerous local Mongol leaders who enjoyed a high degree of independence from the court of the khans. Ruthless exploitation under strong military pressure was therefore characteristic of the early phase of Mongol domination, which may be said to have lasted until about 1234, some seven years after Genghis Khan’s death.
hope it helped!! xoxo
Diplomacy between Cheyenne and Settlers
Whether through diplomacy, war, or even alliances, Native American efforts to resist European encroachment further into their lands were often unsuccessful in the colonial era. This woodcut shows members of the Cheyenne nation conducting diplomacy with settlers of European descent in the 1800s.
Http://studylib.net/doc/8860627/patriots--loyalists-and-%E2%80%9Cundecideds%E2%80%9D
this website can help you find your answer, i do not want to do the researching for you so just go look at the site and read a bit.
Hope i helped :)