Answer:
(3) option is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Constructors need to initialize the object in the memory. "To declare the Constructor for any class the user needs to specify the constructor name which is already the class name". This is an object-oriented language guideline.
It is because the object is created by the name of the class and Constructor is used to allocate the memory for the object. hence Constructor is created by the name of the class.
For example--
class test //class name test
{
test() //created a constructor with class name "test"
{
}
}
In the above example class name and constructor name are same if it not then it will gives a error.
Another option is not valid for the answer to the above problem because-
- Option 1 is wrong because, for any class, the data member is a type of variable, which is used to store the data and is accessed with the help of an object.
- Option 2 is wrong because, for any class, member function is a type of user function used to accessed the variable and expressions.
- Option 4 is wrong because, package is a set used to hold classes and interfaces.
Answer:
Answer below
Explanation:
Maximum transmission unit (MTU)
A maximum transmission unit (MTU) is the largest packet or frame size that is usually specified in Eight-bit bytes, which can be sent in a packet or frame-based network such as the internet.
Longest Prefix Match
Longest prefix match is an algorithm used by routers in Internet Protocol to lookup the IP prefix that will likely be the terminal point of the next hop from the router.
CIDR and Subnet Mask
CIDR, known in full as Classless inter-domain routing, is a set of IP standards that is used to make customized identifiers for networks and individual devices.
A subnet mask separates the internet protocol (IP) address into the network address and host address.
Switching Fabric
Switching fabric is simply an arrangement of the elements of a communication network also known as network topology, whereby the nodes of the network are seen to interconnect with one or more network switches.
Explanation:
<h3> I think it is False</h3>
hope it's help
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
Answer:
how many event you have been too in the last month (well non during this time but as an example)
Explanation:
